Understanding the Origin of Lithiophilicity Toward Molten Li-Metal Using <i>In-situ</i> Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintaining a uniform Li deposition at the anode electrode/electrolyte interface is a fundamental challenge during extended cycling of solid-state Li batteries. The reactivity of the Li metal at the current collector surface remains a principal parameter for battery optimization. It is known that a bare Cu foil current collector substrate does not have a good lithiophilic surface to deposit molten Li metal because the Cu surface’s wettability by a Li metal melt is very poor, requiring a metal or metal oxide interlayer to improve wetting [1, 2]. Zn is considered one of the most promising lithiophilic elements. In this work, we used in-situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to study the interfacial reactions between molten Li metal and Cu foil current collector modified by a thin Zn film (Cu@Zn) to understand the origin of lithiophilicity. We performed in-situ heating tests on a Cu foil substrate coated with a 50 nm Zn interlayer (Cu@Zn) in contact with a Li metal foil in SEM. We present experimental heating and cooling set ups for in-situ Li study inside a high vacuum SEM. We present our observations of the reaction between the molten Li metal and Cu surface during Li solidification in real time as well as post-mortem energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) on the coatings to analyze the chemistry of the reaction products. For the first time in literature, our in-situ study shows the existence of a metastable ternary Li-Cu-Zn alloy at 300 °C after the reaction of Cu@Zn with the molten Li metal. We report the segregation of Cu and Zn by formation of Cu-Zn intermetallic compounds during the cooling down step. The schematic of the experimental set up for in-situ heating tests inside the SEM in Figure 1 shows the in-situ SEM observation (top view) of Li metal wettability of a Cu@50nm (nominal thickness) Zn foil substrate in contact with a molten Li metal at 300 °C. We observed the wettability of the Cu@Zn foil near the edges of the Li metal foil where the molten Li metal contacted the substrate. Subsequently, the in-situ SEM observation (top view) of Li metastability showed formation of secondary phase particles on the Li surface during Li solidification. Figure 2A-B show the top view snapshots of the Cu@Zn and metallic Li surface observed in in-situ settings. The Li surface microstructure of the same area (indicated by the red circle in Figure 2B) at 300 °C and after cool down to RT are shown in Figure 2C-D. We will discuss these results in the context of the understanding the chemical reactivity of molten Li toward metal foils. Utilizing in-situ SEM is pivotal to clarify the interfacial reactions occurring between a lithiophilic current collector and molten Li metal and have utmost importance for designing advanced new anode materials for future solid-state battery applications. Schematic of the in-situ heating set up inside the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Top view snapshot of the Cu@Zn foil substrate (A), top view snapshot of the metallic Li foil (B), the Li surface microstructure at 300 °C (C) and after cool down to RT (D). The backscattered electron (BSE) images in (C-D) were taken from the same area indicated in red in (B) at the same magnification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".