The Eagle, the Bell, and other Fragments from the Intersecting Stories of Queen Anne's Chapel and Fort Hunter
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Eagle, the Bell, and other Fragments from the Intersecting Stories of Queen Anne's Chapel and Fort Hunter James W. Bradley (bio) and James B. Richardson III (bio) Background Although established for fundamentally varied reasons, the stories of Queen Anne's Chapel and Fort Hunter have been intertwined from the beginning. In June 1701, William III, the Protestant King of England, established by Royal Charter a new organization, the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (hereafter SPG). The new society had two main aims: to strengthen Christian ministry among English people overseas and to evangelize of the non-Christian peoples of the world, especially in North America. In part, this was a response to the remarkable success French Jesuits had had among Indian peoples. It was also part of a broader plan to bring English manners and customs to the wayward colonies in America.1 This fit well with plans of the governor of New York at the time. Richard Coote, First Earl of Bellomont, was a devoted Anglican and a strong advocate for a missionary presence among the neighboring Mohawks, the easternmost of the Five Nations. He was also a good imperial agent. The primary purpose of Coote's 1700 plan was to build an English fort in Indian country, one with "100 Souldiers constantly in Garison … employed in making tar and pitch during peace time." Hopefully, Coote continued, "this would draw some English families thither and maybe a minister as well." Although Coote's's plan was derailed by New York's chaotic politics during the first decade of the eighteenth century, everyone agreed on the need to have a fort somewhere in Mohawk territory. Especially as renewed hostilities with the French began in 1702 (Queen Anne's War), it was vital to have a marker of English imperial claims to the Mohawk Valley.2 [End Page 136] After William III's death, his successor Queen Anne continued to support the SPG, sponsoring the publication of An Account of the Society in 1706 and encouraging Anglican priests to relocate to New York. The Reverend Thomas Barclay, "a priest of greater vision" than his predecessors, arrived in Albany in 1708 and began to visit the eastern Mohawk town known as Tionontogue. At this time the Anglican Church did not exist beyond New York City. Although a few priests had begun missionary efforts in Albany, there was no established Anglican Church, and there was little support for one. Most of the Anglo-Dutch inhabitants remained strongly tied to their Dutch Reformed heritage. The first Anglian Church, St. Peter's in Albany, would not be established until 1715, and its building was not completed two years after that.3 A pivotal event occurred in the spring of 1710 when the visit to London of the renowned "Four Indian Kings" took place. Engineered by Peter Schuyler, mayor of Albany, and Col. Francis Nicholson (an active member of the Society), the real goal of the visit was to raise interest in another invasion of Canada after the embarrassing failure of the previous attempt in 1709.4 As a public relations event, the trip was successful and raised significant public and royal support. In their address to Queen Anne on April 19, the four representatives followed Schuyler's script and asked for military assistance as well as Anglican missionaries. The Queen was deeply moved by these exotic and dignified men and, although the documentary trail is thin in terms of written instructions, several follow-up commands were issued. On May 2, the "Indian Sachems" sent a reply, undoubtedly drafted by Schuyler and Nicolson, expressing their "great satisfaction" in accepting the proposals prepared for the Queen. As John Lydekker reports, "The Queen supported the Society's proposals and gave orders for the erection of a fort in Mohawk country" but does not cite a specific reference for this in the SPG archives.5 When Schuyler and his delegation returned from London in May, they found a new political landscape. Three years earlier, England and Scotland had merged to become Great Britain through the Acts of Union signed in May 1707. In June 1710, the newly appointed [End Page 137] governor...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».