Letter from the Editors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Letter from the Editors Robert Chiles, Devin R. Lander, Jennifer Lemak, and Aaron Noble Dear Readers, A consistent factor throughout New York's dynamic history has been the complex interactions between groups with divergent worldviews and conflicting ambitions. Such scenarios have proven at different times to be creative, exploitative, empowering, or contradictory. This issue offers a rich array of such interactions, with articles offering unique insights from diverse perspectives. Articles by Jaap Jacobs and Anne-Clair Faucquez provide important insights into slavery in New Netherland. In "The Arrival of Enslaved Africans in New Amsterdam," Jacobs explores global and regional historical evidence to provide a revisionist timeline for the introduction of slavery into the colony, while Faucquez explores the community-building work of enslaved people in New Amsterdam and follows that crucial history into contemporary memory in "Community-Building in the History and Memory of Slavery in Dutch New York." Articles by Timothy J. Shannon and Evan Haefeli offer new understandings of Indigenous diplomacy in colonial New York using neglected sources to provide new perspectives. Haefeli uses diverse sources, including Mohawk oral traditions, to reconstruct and contextualize the Haudenosaunee-Lenape treaty of 1669 in "The Great Haudenosaunee-Lenape Peace of 1669: Oral Traditions, Colonial Records, and the Origin of the Delaware's Status as 'Women.'" Shannon's contribution, "In the Bushes: The Secret History of Anglo-Iroquois Treaty Making," explores private journals and diaries to transcend the official records of negotiations and to reveal a cultural milieu that fused Indigenous and European customs to produce a cultural context for diplomacy. James W. Bradley and James B. Richardson III likewise explore the complex interactions between colonists and natives in "The Eagle, the Bell, and other Fragments from the Intersecting Stories of Queen Anne's Chapel and Fort Hunter," using the discovery of two unusual material objects to investigate the changing cultural relationships between European colonists and their Protestant Mohawk neighbors in eighteenth-century New York. Also exploring how diverging perspectives drove historical events in colonial New York, Steven G. Wapen notes the salience of conflicts between Oswego's military garrison and Lake Ontario fur traders on the eve of the Seven Years' War in "Determined Justice on the New York Frontier: The 1752 Mutiny and Desertion at Oswego." [End Page vii] New York State's more recent history is also marked by complex interactions, as demonstrated by Lawrence J. King in "Memorial Day's Interracial Legacy in Brooklyn, New York, 1878–1897," and by Stuart M. Blumin and Glenn C. Altschuler in their article "When Sunday Baseball Came to Brooklyn." King reveals a palpable sense of interracial solidarity that embodied Memorial Day celebrations in post–Civil War Brooklyn, weathering racial divides and championing remembrance's inclusivity in the late nineteenth century. Blumin and Altschuler analyze the social and cultural conflicts that led first to the prohibition—and then to the legalization—of Sunday Baseball in Brooklyn. Combining these articles with Ashley Hopkins-Benton's Artifact NY feature—which uses a sewing machine to explore industrial life in twentieth-century Chinatown—and Lauren Roberts's Community NY feature exploring work on the 250th anniversary of the Battles of Saratoga, issue 104.1 provides fresh insights on life throughout the Empire State's rich history. Excelsior! THE EDITORS [End Page viii] Copyright © 2023 New York History
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».