"Apprentices of Listening": Sound Studies in Educational Leadership
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"Apprentices of Listening":Sound Studies in Educational Leadership Nicole Brittingham Furlonge (bio) To answer the questions, What does listening mean within your discipline(s)? and What aspects of sound studies as an interdisciplinary field do you translate/transpose into the approaches you take as a researcher and teacher within a more specific discipline of knowledge and university department?, I tune in first to philosopher Gemma Fiumara and then to novelist Ralph Ellison. In The Other Side of Language, Fiumara critiques the privileging of speaking and the declarative as modes of knowing in the discipline of philosophy. She asserts, "If we are apprentices of listening rather than masters of discourse, we might perhaps promote a different sort of coexistence among humans: not so much in the form of a utopian ideal but rather as an incipient philosophical solidarity capable of envisaging the common destiny of the species" (57). Fiumara's turn to apprenticeship highlights the conditional, the possible, and frames listening as a practice that recognizes coexistence. By extension, she offers listening as a "co-" practice—that is, relational, co-generative, and collaborative—where learning and continual practice flourish. Listening, then, has the potential to create a learning culture that amplifies an ethical attentiveness. I explore such listening in my book Race Sounds: The Art of Listening in African American Literature. There, too, Fiumara is an important [End Page 303] thought partner as I worked to show, through listening in print, how African American literature teaches reading audiences about listening and its complexities. The book situates listening as a constellation of practices that actively make meaning, recasting reading and listening "as an aural form of agency, a practice of citizenship, an aural empathy, an ethics of community building, a mode of social and political action, a set of strategies for cultural revision, and a practice of historical thinking" (Furlonge 10). Race Sounds brings together methodologies of literary studies, sound studies, black studies, musicology, history, and pedagogy, to "enliven how we read, write, and critique texts" and to "inform how we might be more effective audiences for each other and against injustice in our midst" (17). Now that my professional appointment is in a School of Education and involves directing a centre that educates in Teaching and Education Leadership, I am focused on exploring the ways in which the interdisciplinary work I engage in across sound studies, literary and cultural studies, pedagogy, and educational leadership can inform our understanding and practice of a listening leadership in which listening—more specifically, an apprenticeship of listening—is core. Leadership in schools involves the careful, attentive work of creating an environment with ideal conditions for listening. To posit a listening leadership invites a move away from the declarative toward prioritizing a different kind of knowing and leading. Such listening has the capacity to critique an intense bias in education leadership toward leadership that is demonstrated through speech and often ignores the active and ethical role listening can play as a core leadership practice and capacity. For me, connecting the sound studies and literary studies-informed work of listening in print is key to understanding the possibilities of a listening leadership. For, if we can't even bear to listen on the page, then how do we learn to listen when we encounter each other? Listening is a constellation of practices that allow us to be more fully engaged, active, sensemaking beings. These practices pose personal, relational, and structural/cultural questions for consideration specifically in the field of education leadership: How might listening be an authentic space of inquiry for leaders? What could the value of listening practices be to one's leadership practice? As a leader, how do I create the conditions that motivate listening? What kinds of habits and plans do we need for shaping student learning, professional learning, and leadership? How might our schools develop habits, structures, and a culture of listening?1 Listening [End Page 304] leadership is leadership practised with the competence and aural literacies to recognize, absorb, interpret, and make sense of the sonic-rich ecosystem of school and learning. In the Education Leadership graduate programs offered through the Klingenstein Center, I often use literature to invite students to...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».