"Apprentices of Listening": Sound Studies in Educational Leadership
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Apprentices of Listening":Sound Studies in Educational Leadership Nicole Brittingham Furlonge (bio) To answer the questions, What does listening mean within your discipline(s)? and What aspects of sound studies as an interdisciplinary field do you translate/transpose into the approaches you take as a researcher and teacher within a more specific discipline of knowledge and university department?, I tune in first to philosopher Gemma Fiumara and then to novelist Ralph Ellison. In The Other Side of Language, Fiumara critiques the privileging of speaking and the declarative as modes of knowing in the discipline of philosophy. She asserts, "If we are apprentices of listening rather than masters of discourse, we might perhaps promote a different sort of coexistence among humans: not so much in the form of a utopian ideal but rather as an incipient philosophical solidarity capable of envisaging the common destiny of the species" (57). Fiumara's turn to apprenticeship highlights the conditional, the possible, and frames listening as a practice that recognizes coexistence. By extension, she offers listening as a "co-" practice—that is, relational, co-generative, and collaborative—where learning and continual practice flourish. Listening, then, has the potential to create a learning culture that amplifies an ethical attentiveness. I explore such listening in my book Race Sounds: The Art of Listening in African American Literature. There, too, Fiumara is an important [End Page 303] thought partner as I worked to show, through listening in print, how African American literature teaches reading audiences about listening and its complexities. The book situates listening as a constellation of practices that actively make meaning, recasting reading and listening "as an aural form of agency, a practice of citizenship, an aural empathy, an ethics of community building, a mode of social and political action, a set of strategies for cultural revision, and a practice of historical thinking" (Furlonge 10). Race Sounds brings together methodologies of literary studies, sound studies, black studies, musicology, history, and pedagogy, to "enliven how we read, write, and critique texts" and to "inform how we might be more effective audiences for each other and against injustice in our midst" (17). Now that my professional appointment is in a School of Education and involves directing a centre that educates in Teaching and Education Leadership, I am focused on exploring the ways in which the interdisciplinary work I engage in across sound studies, literary and cultural studies, pedagogy, and educational leadership can inform our understanding and practice of a listening leadership in which listening—more specifically, an apprenticeship of listening—is core. Leadership in schools involves the careful, attentive work of creating an environment with ideal conditions for listening. To posit a listening leadership invites a move away from the declarative toward prioritizing a different kind of knowing and leading. Such listening has the capacity to critique an intense bias in education leadership toward leadership that is demonstrated through speech and often ignores the active and ethical role listening can play as a core leadership practice and capacity. For me, connecting the sound studies and literary studies-informed work of listening in print is key to understanding the possibilities of a listening leadership. For, if we can't even bear to listen on the page, then how do we learn to listen when we encounter each other? Listening is a constellation of practices that allow us to be more fully engaged, active, sensemaking beings. These practices pose personal, relational, and structural/cultural questions for consideration specifically in the field of education leadership: How might listening be an authentic space of inquiry for leaders? What could the value of listening practices be to one's leadership practice? As a leader, how do I create the conditions that motivate listening? What kinds of habits and plans do we need for shaping student learning, professional learning, and leadership? How might our schools develop habits, structures, and a culture of listening?1 Listening [End Page 304] leadership is leadership practised with the competence and aural literacies to recognize, absorb, interpret, and make sense of the sonic-rich ecosystem of school and learning. In the Education Leadership graduate programs offered through the Klingenstein Center, I often use literature to invite students to...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".