MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385591419 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.a903563

"Apprentices of Listening": Sound Studies in Educational Leadership

2020· article· en· W4385591419 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicole Brittingham Furlonge

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningReflective listeningAppreciative listeningReading (process)Informational listeningSociologyPedagogyPsychologyEpistemologyLinguisticsPhilosophyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Apprentices of Listening":Sound Studies in Educational Leadership Nicole Brittingham Furlonge (bio) To answer the questions, What does listening mean within your discipline(s)? and What aspects of sound studies as an interdisciplinary field do you translate/transpose into the approaches you take as a researcher and teacher within a more specific discipline of knowledge and university department?, I tune in first to philosopher Gemma Fiumara and then to novelist Ralph Ellison. In The Other Side of Language, Fiumara critiques the privileging of speaking and the declarative as modes of knowing in the discipline of philosophy. She asserts, "If we are apprentices of listening rather than masters of discourse, we might perhaps promote a different sort of coexistence among humans: not so much in the form of a utopian ideal but rather as an incipient philosophical solidarity capable of envisaging the common destiny of the species" (57). Fiumara's turn to apprenticeship highlights the conditional, the possible, and frames listening as a practice that recognizes coexistence. By extension, she offers listening as a "co-" practice—that is, relational, co-generative, and collaborative—where learning and continual practice flourish. Listening, then, has the potential to create a learning culture that amplifies an ethical attentiveness. I explore such listening in my book Race Sounds: The Art of Listening in African American Literature. There, too, Fiumara is an important [End Page 303] thought partner as I worked to show, through listening in print, how African American literature teaches reading audiences about listening and its complexities. The book situates listening as a constellation of practices that actively make meaning, recasting reading and listening "as an aural form of agency, a practice of citizenship, an aural empathy, an ethics of community building, a mode of social and political action, a set of strategies for cultural revision, and a practice of historical thinking" (Furlonge 10). Race Sounds brings together methodologies of literary studies, sound studies, black studies, musicology, history, and pedagogy, to "enliven how we read, write, and critique texts" and to "inform how we might be more effective audiences for each other and against injustice in our midst" (17). Now that my professional appointment is in a School of Education and involves directing a centre that educates in Teaching and Education Leadership, I am focused on exploring the ways in which the interdisciplinary work I engage in across sound studies, literary and cultural studies, pedagogy, and educational leadership can inform our understanding and practice of a listening leadership in which listening—more specifically, an apprenticeship of listening—is core. Leadership in schools involves the careful, attentive work of creating an environment with ideal conditions for listening. To posit a listening leadership invites a move away from the declarative toward prioritizing a different kind of knowing and leading. Such listening has the capacity to critique an intense bias in education leadership toward leadership that is demonstrated through speech and often ignores the active and ethical role listening can play as a core leadership practice and capacity. For me, connecting the sound studies and literary studies-informed work of listening in print is key to understanding the possibilities of a listening leadership. For, if we can't even bear to listen on the page, then how do we learn to listen when we encounter each other? Listening is a constellation of practices that allow us to be more fully engaged, active, sensemaking beings. These practices pose personal, relational, and structural/cultural questions for consideration specifically in the field of education leadership: How might listening be an authentic space of inquiry for leaders? What could the value of listening practices be to one's leadership practice? As a leader, how do I create the conditions that motivate listening? What kinds of habits and plans do we need for shaping student learning, professional learning, and leadership? How might our schools develop habits, structures, and a culture of listening?1 Listening [End Page 304] leadership is leadership practised with the competence and aural literacies to recognize, absorb, interpret, and make sense of the sonic-rich ecosystem of school and learning. In the Education Leadership graduate programs offered through the Klingenstein Center, I often use literature to invite students to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.025
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0060.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.027 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207