"Collage With Jackhammer": James Reaney, the Art of Noises, and the Paraphonic Sound Collage
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"Collage With Jackhammer":James Reaney, the Art of Noises, and the Paraphonic Sound Collage Michael O'Driscoll (bio) Wherever we are, what we hear is mostly noise. When we ignore it, it disturbs us. When we listen to it, we find it fascinating. John Cage, "The Future of Music: Credo" (1937) On 16 january 1969, Canadian poet and playwright James Reaney paid a visit to a classroom of students where he performed excerpts from, and discussed the aesthetic sensibility of, his celebrated 1967 play Colours in the Dark. Reaney's classroom visit was recorded on reel-to-reel tape and has been digitized and preserved as part of the collection maintained by the University of Alberta (ua) partners in the SpokenWeb research network.1 The location of the recorded event is not indicated on the audio object. The spine on the original reel-to-reel tape box indicates "POETRY READING: James Reaney" in type with a corresponding ua Department of English media catalogue number; the back of the box includes a handwritten note "DEPT OF ENGLISH POETRY READING" in block capitals, and "James Reaney Jan 16, 1969" in a scripted, different hand; a third set of box [End Page 63] notes, again in a different hand, offers some broad topic areas indexed by tape counter numbers; a fourth hand, also in block letters, warns "NOISY TAPE. VOICE KEEPS LOSING MIKE." The recording itself also offers no clues as to the precise location or host instructor—Reaney acknowledges his host at the outset, but his articulation of the name is muffled. Nonetheless, the style and mode of delivery clearly suggests a guest classroom lecture in a university. Because two of the four forms of handwriting can be matched with other recordings known to be made at the University of Alberta, our presumption is that the recording was, indeed, conducted somewhere on campus, although it is possible the event was recorded elsewhere and this singular, master tape entered into the local collection by other, unknown means. A landmark achievement by one of Canada's premier playwrights, Reaney's Colours in the Dark is a brilliant and unconventional play consisting of two acts, each containing twenty-one vignettes, that describe in shifting temporalities the progress of one man's life from birth to middle-age in rural southern Ontario, the geological time of central North America since the last ice age, and the narrative arc of the Bible. The play is cast with six actors that each fulfill more than a half-dozen roles alongside a four-person chorus and a cluster of children. Set on a minimalist stage backed by five projection screens displaying colours and images, the play was performed under the direction of John Hirsch first at the Stratford Festival and then, two years later, at Vancouver's Playhouse Theatre, directed by Timothy Bond. Colours hovers between the banality of its storyline (Reaney's 1969 published introductory note describes it as "a person growing up, leaving home, going to big cities, getting rather mixed up and then not coming home again, but making home and identity come to him wherever he is" [7]), a powerful mystical or fantastical quality that governs the mood and resolution of the performance, and a carefully executed visual and aural documentary method that draws from the archival records, landscapes, and soundscapes of southern Ontario communities and institutions. Interspersed throughout the lines of dialogue that animate the playful and ritualistic activity of the characters are a number of evocative poems performed variously by the actors in their multiple roles. In his retrospective assessment of the play, Alvin Lee summarizes its reception: "the public response to Colours in the Dark was very enthusiastic. The standing ovation for the author on opening night was followed by at least nine strongly favourable reviews, contrasted with one splenetic one in the usual Toronto column" (146). Whatever negative response it drew was no doubt partly motivated by its dynamic structure [End Page 64] and playful irreverence—the same qualities that made Colours such a compelling experience for its audience. The play's formal design draws on a long history of artistic practices of collage, montage, or bricolage...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».