MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385591452 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.a903556

"Collage With Jackhammer": James Reaney, the Art of Noises, and the Paraphonic Sound Collage

2020· article· en· W4385591452 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mike O’Driscoll

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryReading (process)ArtReelVisual artsSensibilityArt historyLiteratureLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Collage With Jackhammer":James Reaney, the Art of Noises, and the Paraphonic Sound Collage Michael O'Driscoll (bio) Wherever we are, what we hear is mostly noise. When we ignore it, it disturbs us. When we listen to it, we find it fascinating. John Cage, "The Future of Music: Credo" (1937) On 16 january 1969, Canadian poet and playwright James Reaney paid a visit to a classroom of students where he performed excerpts from, and discussed the aesthetic sensibility of, his celebrated 1967 play Colours in the Dark. Reaney's classroom visit was recorded on reel-to-reel tape and has been digitized and preserved as part of the collection maintained by the University of Alberta (ua) partners in the SpokenWeb research network.1 The location of the recorded event is not indicated on the audio object. The spine on the original reel-to-reel tape box indicates "POETRY READING: James Reaney" in type with a corresponding ua Department of English media catalogue number; the back of the box includes a handwritten note "DEPT OF ENGLISH POETRY READING" in block capitals, and "James Reaney Jan 16, 1969" in a scripted, different hand; a third set of box [End Page 63] notes, again in a different hand, offers some broad topic areas indexed by tape counter numbers; a fourth hand, also in block letters, warns "NOISY TAPE. VOICE KEEPS LOSING MIKE." The recording itself also offers no clues as to the precise location or host instructor—Reaney acknowledges his host at the outset, but his articulation of the name is muffled. Nonetheless, the style and mode of delivery clearly suggests a guest classroom lecture in a university. Because two of the four forms of handwriting can be matched with other recordings known to be made at the University of Alberta, our presumption is that the recording was, indeed, conducted somewhere on campus, although it is possible the event was recorded elsewhere and this singular, master tape entered into the local collection by other, unknown means. A landmark achievement by one of Canada's premier playwrights, Reaney's Colours in the Dark is a brilliant and unconventional play consisting of two acts, each containing twenty-one vignettes, that describe in shifting temporalities the progress of one man's life from birth to middle-age in rural southern Ontario, the geological time of central North America since the last ice age, and the narrative arc of the Bible. The play is cast with six actors that each fulfill more than a half-dozen roles alongside a four-person chorus and a cluster of children. Set on a minimalist stage backed by five projection screens displaying colours and images, the play was performed under the direction of John Hirsch first at the Stratford Festival and then, two years later, at Vancouver's Playhouse Theatre, directed by Timothy Bond. Colours hovers between the banality of its storyline (Reaney's 1969 published introductory note describes it as "a person growing up, leaving home, going to big cities, getting rather mixed up and then not coming home again, but making home and identity come to him wherever he is" [7]), a powerful mystical or fantastical quality that governs the mood and resolution of the performance, and a carefully executed visual and aural documentary method that draws from the archival records, landscapes, and soundscapes of southern Ontario communities and institutions. Interspersed throughout the lines of dialogue that animate the playful and ritualistic activity of the characters are a number of evocative poems performed variously by the actors in their multiple roles. In his retrospective assessment of the play, Alvin Lee summarizes its reception: "the public response to Colours in the Dark was very enthusiastic. The standing ovation for the author on opening night was followed by at least nine strongly favourable reviews, contrasted with one splenetic one in the usual Toronto column" (146). Whatever negative response it drew was no doubt partly motivated by its dynamic structure [End Page 64] and playful irreverence—the same qualities that made Colours such a compelling experience for its audience. The play's formal design draws on a long history of artistic practices of collage, montage, or bricolage...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207