Systematic review and meta-analysis Literature-based Clinical Retrospective Analysis of Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (ARPC) is a rare dermatosis that usually associated with systemic disease. The associations, characteristics and treatment regimen of ARPC are not well understood. This systematic review was performed to retrospectively evaluate the diagnosis and treatment statuses of ARPC. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was independently performed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted and qualitatively analyzed. The quality of the articles was assessed by using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The data are described in this article. The study was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews system with CRD 42023448576. Results: In total, 189 patients (98 women, 91 men) in 124 studies were analyzed. Their mean age was 57.31 ± 15.21 years. A total of 88.89% ( n = 168) of the patients had one or more systemic diseases, of which 57.67% ( n = 109) had diabetes mellitus, 29.10% ( n = 55) had chronic renal failure, 25.93% ( n = 49) had hypertension, and 13.76% had malignancy ( n = 26). The most frequently affected area was the lower extremities (72.49%, n = 137), followed by the trunk (70.37%, n = 133) and the upper extremities (63.49%, n = 120). One hundred sixty (84.66%) patients had pruritus, and 32.80% ( n = 62) of them were positive for the Koebner phenomenon. Oral antihistamines and topical steroids were the most common treatments in this study, followed by narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy and allopurinol. Management of concomitant systemic diseases also resulted in improvement of ARPC. Conclusion: In this systematic review, ARPC was frequently associated with systemic diseases, especially diabetes mellitus, renal failure, hypertension, and malignancy. The lower extremities and trunk were the most frequently affected areas, and pruritus usually appeared. Antihistamines and topical steroids were the most commonly used treatments, and we recommend narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy as the first-line treatment. Management of systemic diseases and relief of pruritus should be considered simultaneously.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».