MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385829244 · doi:10.1097/jd9.0000000000000336

Systematic review and meta-analysis Literature-based Clinical Retrospective Analysis of Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis

2023· article· en· W4385829244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qingjie Hu, Jingjing Chen, Xu Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Dermatology and Venereology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConcomitantDermatologyDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineMalignancyAllopurinolSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (ARPC) is a rare dermatosis that usually associated with systemic disease. The associations, characteristics and treatment regimen of ARPC are not well understood. This systematic review was performed to retrospectively evaluate the diagnosis and treatment statuses of ARPC. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was independently performed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted and qualitatively analyzed. The quality of the articles was assessed by using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The data are described in this article. The study was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews system with CRD 42023448576. Results: In total, 189 patients (98 women, 91 men) in 124 studies were analyzed. Their mean age was 57.31 ± 15.21 years. A total of 88.89% ( n = 168) of the patients had one or more systemic diseases, of which 57.67% ( n = 109) had diabetes mellitus, 29.10% ( n = 55) had chronic renal failure, 25.93% ( n = 49) had hypertension, and 13.76% had malignancy ( n = 26). The most frequently affected area was the lower extremities (72.49%, n = 137), followed by the trunk (70.37%, n = 133) and the upper extremities (63.49%, n = 120). One hundred sixty (84.66%) patients had pruritus, and 32.80% ( n = 62) of them were positive for the Koebner phenomenon. Oral antihistamines and topical steroids were the most common treatments in this study, followed by narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy and allopurinol. Management of concomitant systemic diseases also resulted in improvement of ARPC. Conclusion: In this systematic review, ARPC was frequently associated with systemic diseases, especially diabetes mellitus, renal failure, hypertension, and malignancy. The lower extremities and trunk were the most frequently affected areas, and pruritus usually appeared. Antihistamines and topical steroids were the most commonly used treatments, and we recommend narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy as the first-line treatment. Management of systemic diseases and relief of pruritus should be considered simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Dermatology and VenereologySame topicDermatological and Skeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207