MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385990485 · doi:10.1353/cdr.2023.a904535

"The Isle Is Full of Noises": the Many Tempests of Margaret Atwood's Hag-Seed

2023· article· en· W4385990485 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa L. Caldwell

Notice bibliographique

RevueComparative drama · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaAdaptation (eye)LiteratureIdeologyParatextArtAntecedent (behavioral psychology)HypertextHistoryComputer sciencePsychologyPhysicsLawPolitical scienceOpticsSocial psychologyWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"The Isle Is Full of Noises": the Many Tempests of Margaret Atwood's Hag-Seed Melissa Caldwell (bio) Hag-Seed, Meta-Adaptation, and Paratext Drama, as Julie Sanders has written, is "an inherently adaptive art," but the line between production and adaptation is not always clear.1 Differences between the interpretation of an original text and the creation of a new text can be difficult to judge. Cary Mazer has argued that all dramatic productions exist "along a continuum" of adaptation because "virtually every production deviates from the original script in intent, aesthetic method, theatrical convention, and ideology; scripts are routinely cut and trimmed, with scenes and segments transposed or repositioned … characters cut, conflated, or combined, with changes of age, race, and gender."2 Indeed, the qualities used by Mazer to describe a production could be applied to almost any modern literary adaptation. Although Mazer herself distinguishes a production from an adaptation, ultimately she argues that the difference between a more radically inventive production—the kind that leads to the creation of an adaptation—and a more faithful representation of an antecedent text is "a difference in degree but not in kind."3 The close connection suggested by Mazer between production and adaptation bears some similarity to Gérard Genette's definition of an adaptation. In Genette's formulation, the adaptation, or hypertext, offers "a simple or direct transformation" of an antecedent text, what Genette calls the hypotext. The "transposing [of] the action" of Homer's Odyssey that [End Page 119] occurs in a work such as James Joyce's Ulysses is one such transformation.4 Among the most important categories of adaptation for Genette are the ones that cross genre: "serious transformation, or transposition, is without any doubt the most important of all hypertextual practices … [it] can give rise to works of vast dimensions … whose textual amplitude and aesthetic and/or ideological ambition may mask or even completely obfuscate their hypertextual character."5 Shakespeare originally wrote his dramatic works with the assumption of transposition; in other words, Shakespeare wrote his plays to be transformed from a page to the stage. With this intent came the understanding that performance is a necessarily interpretative act undertaken in a public space for an audience in a specific context. Generic transposition is also a practice Shakespeare could have conceptualized, at least to some degree, since he regularly adapted the plots of his plays from popular prose fiction of his era. And in converting these fictional tales to dramatic form, he prepared the way for them to be readapted and reinterpreted in our era. In Hag-Seed (2106), Margaret Atwood makes the most out of this "invitation to reinvention"6 in her novelization of The Tempest, a play for which there is no known hypotext. The novel is an adaptation that engages in generic transposition in multifaceted ways as it uses both narrative and form to make the reader aware of the movement from one genre to another. Any novelist who comes to Shakespeare's work must be ready to wrestle both with its dramatic and poetic nature, for the prosification of a Shakespearean play will involve grappling with both. While poetics is beyond the scope of this essay, in what follows I will focus on the ways in which the move from dramatic work to novel is at the forefront of Atwood's mind in her adaptation of The Tempest. The reader is never allowed to forget that the novel is adapted not just from an antecedent text, but specifically from a dramatic work. Atwood intentionally cultivates this awareness in the reader by not only retelling the story of Shakespeare's play but also narrativizing the adaptative art. It is easy to assume that the purpose of Atwood's novel is a "faithful" translation of Shakespeare's late romance into the 21st century. The novel's full title clearly categorizes it as a "retelling," leaving no question that the author intends the work to be read as an adaptation of The Tempest. Although radically changed from Shakespeare's deserted isle populated with Italian politicians to a literal [End Page 120] stage in Canada in 2013, Atwood painstakingly seeks out "equivalence" for each...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,049

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,004
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueComparative dramaMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207