S145: VENETOCLAX-OBINUTUZUMAB FOR PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: 6-YEAR RESULTS OF THE RANDOMIZED CLL14 STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Topic: 6. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related disorders - Clinical Background: One-year fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) is a standard-of-care for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The CLL14 study previously demonstrated high efficacy and good tolerability of Ven-Obi in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. Due to its ongoing follow-up, the CLL14 study provides unique insights into the long-term outcomes of patients after Ven-Obi treatment completion. Aims: The aim of this report is to provide updated efficacy and safety data from the ongoing follow-up of the CLL14 study, all patients being off study treatment for ≥ 5 years. Methods: Patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions were randomized 1:1 to 12 cycles of venetoclax with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab, or 12 cycles of chlorambucil with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included safety, rates of minimal residual disease (MRD), time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS). Follow-up is ongoing. Results: Of the 432 enrolled patients, 216 were randomly assigned to receive Ven-Obi and 216 to receive Clb-Obi. At a median follow-up of 76.4 months (interquartile range 52.5-80.5), PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared to Clb-Obi (median 76.2 vs 36.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.40 [95% CI 0.31-0.52], p<0.0001). At 6 years after randomization, the estimated investigator-assessed PFS rate was 53.1% after Ven-Obi, and 21.7% after Clb-Obi. Progressive disease (PD) occurred in 67 cases in the Ven-Obi arm with 39 second-line treatment initiations, and in 141 cases in the Clb-Obi arm (with 103 second-line treatments). TTNT was significantly longer after Ven-Obi (6-year TTNT 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58, p<0.0001). In both arms, the most frequent second-line treatments were BTK inhibitors (61.5% in the Ven-Obi arm, 55.4% in the Clb-Obi arm). The PFS and TTNT difference between the two arms was maintained across all risk groups, including patients with TP53 mutation/deletion (median PFS 51.9 vs 20.8 months; median TTNT 57.3 vs 29.0 months) and unmutated IGHV status (median PFS 64.8 vs 26.9 months; median TTNT 85.4 vs 40.6 months). Multivariate analysis identified TP53 deletion/mutation, unmutated IGHV and lymph node size ≥5 cm as independent negative prognostic factors for PFS in patients treated with Ven-Obi. Five years after treatment completion, 17 (7.9% of the intention-to-treat population) patients in the Ven-Obi arm still had uMRD (<10-4 by NGS in peripheral blood), 22 (10.2%) had low (L)-MRD (≥ 10-4 and < 10-2) and 23 (10.6%) high (H)-MRD (≥ 10-2), compared to 4 (1.9%) uMRD, 9 (4.2%) L-MRD and 18 (8.3%) H-MRD in the Clb-Obi arm. Overall, 48 deaths were reported in the Ven-Obi arm (9 PD related) and 70 in the Clb-Obi arm (26 PD related); at 6-year-OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR 0.69 [0.48-1.01], p=0.052). Second primary malignancies were reported in 30 patients in the Ven-Obi and 18 in the Clb-Obi arm; cumulative incidences 6 years after randomization were 14.2% and 8.5%, respectively (p=0.071). Two Richter transformations were reported in the Ven-Obi arm and four in the Clb-Obi arm. No new safety signals were observed. Summary/Conclusion: These data confirm a long-term PFS benefit of fixed-duration Ven-Obi treatment compared to Clb-Obi, including patients with high-risk CLL. Five years after completing Ven-Obi, over half of patients remained in remission, and over 60% had not required second-line treatment. The 1-year Ven-Obi regimen is an effective fixed-duration option for patients with CLL and coexisting conditions.Keywords: Obinutuzumab, Venetoclax, B-CLL, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».