Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Urban literature, at its broadest, is writing that is in some way engaged with the city. While this category can include literature that is written in or inspired by urban life, most often such texts are characterized by their literary representation of the city. There are many ways that authors may represent the city: by setting a narrative in an urban environment; exploring themes associated with city life such as industrialization, anonymity, or cosmopolitanism; or even through experimentation with formal techniques that create for the reader an imaginative impression of city life. The origins of writing about cities, with respect to Britain and Ireland, are as old as cities themselves—but the latter half of the 20th century marked an important shift in critical attention to urban literature, and it is this body of work upon which this bibliography focuses. This shift in critical attention—often referred to as the “spatial turn”—is characterized by the prioritization of space rather than time as the central organizing principle of literary texts, and therefore an important category of analysis. Early momentum for this recasting of critical interest was given its impetus by texts such as Raymond Williams’s The Country and the City (1973) and Burton Pike’s The Image of the City in Modern Literature (1981), which looked to literature to understand patterns of changing emotional and material life and their embeddedness in the landscape. By the early 1990s, English translations of key studies of space such as Michel de Certeau’s The Practice of Everyday Life (1984) and Henri Lefebvre’s The Production of Space (1991) offered new ways to think about literature as a form of spatialization, and work such as Edward Soja’s Thirdspace (1996) and Doreen Massey’s Space, Place, Gender (1994) helpfully reframed and expanded earlier methodologies. Such theoretical work captured the interest of literary critics who proposed ways of seeing the city not as a stage on which narrative action took place, but as an active and dynamic force in shaping both the content and form of literature. This shift provoked innovative examinations of the relationship between urban space, representation, and modernity itself—themes evident in Cynthia Wall’s influential The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London (1998), and which have endured through to Nina Levine’s more recent Practicing the City: Early Modern London on Stage (2016). It also offered new frameworks from which to examine the relationship between genres and the aesthetic representation of the city as in Nicholas Freeman’s Conceiving the City (2007) and Tanya Agathocleous’s Urban Realism and the Cosmopolitan Imagination in the Nineteenth Century (2011). Postcolonial criticism—a theoretical framework that has always attended to the spatial implications of uneven power structures—offered new ways to conceive of both the material and imaginative relationship between the imperial and the metropolitan, as in John Ball’s Imagining London (2004) and Rashmi Varma’s The Postcolonial City and Its Subjects (2012). Questions of identity, home, and belonging have also shaped the work of scholars interested in the representational politics of class, race, gender, and sexuality particularly since the publication of Deborah Epstein Nord’s Walking the Victorian Streets (1995) and Judith Walkowitz’s City of Dreadful Delight (1992). Considerations of categories of social power and their articulation in urban space by scholars such as Sharon Marcus in Apartment Stories (1999) and Seth Koven in Slumming (2004) articulated in precise and productive ways what has long captivated writers about the city: its density, its heterogeneity, and its precarity—and the ambivalent experience of existing in such a space.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,106 | 0,040 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».