MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Urban Literature

2023· reference-entry· en· W4386029658 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Robertson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeEveryday lifeRepresentation (politics)SociologyAestheticsSpace (punctuation)CosmopolitanismHistoryArtLiteraturePoliticsLinguisticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban literature, at its broadest, is writing that is in some way engaged with the city. While this category can include literature that is written in or inspired by urban life, most often such texts are characterized by their literary representation of the city. There are many ways that authors may represent the city: by setting a narrative in an urban environment; exploring themes associated with city life such as industrialization, anonymity, or cosmopolitanism; or even through experimentation with formal techniques that create for the reader an imaginative impression of city life. The origins of writing about cities, with respect to Britain and Ireland, are as old as cities themselves—but the latter half of the 20th century marked an important shift in critical attention to urban literature, and it is this body of work upon which this bibliography focuses. This shift in critical attention—often referred to as the “spatial turn”—is characterized by the prioritization of space rather than time as the central organizing principle of literary texts, and therefore an important category of analysis. Early momentum for this recasting of critical interest was given its impetus by texts such as Raymond Williams’s The Country and the City (1973) and Burton Pike’s The Image of the City in Modern Literature (1981), which looked to literature to understand patterns of changing emotional and material life and their embeddedness in the landscape. By the early 1990s, English translations of key studies of space such as Michel de Certeau’s The Practice of Everyday Life (1984) and Henri Lefebvre’s The Production of Space (1991) offered new ways to think about literature as a form of spatialization, and work such as Edward Soja’s Thirdspace (1996) and Doreen Massey’s Space, Place, Gender (1994) helpfully reframed and expanded earlier methodologies. Such theoretical work captured the interest of literary critics who proposed ways of seeing the city not as a stage on which narrative action took place, but as an active and dynamic force in shaping both the content and form of literature. This shift provoked innovative examinations of the relationship between urban space, representation, and modernity itself—themes evident in Cynthia Wall’s influential The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London (1998), and which have endured through to Nina Levine’s more recent Practicing the City: Early Modern London on Stage (2016). It also offered new frameworks from which to examine the relationship between genres and the aesthetic representation of the city as in Nicholas Freeman’s Conceiving the City (2007) and Tanya Agathocleous’s Urban Realism and the Cosmopolitan Imagination in the Nineteenth Century (2011). Postcolonial criticism—a theoretical framework that has always attended to the spatial implications of uneven power structures—offered new ways to conceive of both the material and imaginative relationship between the imperial and the metropolitan, as in John Ball’s Imagining London (2004) and Rashmi Varma’s The Postcolonial City and Its Subjects (2012). Questions of identity, home, and belonging have also shaped the work of scholars interested in the representational politics of class, race, gender, and sexuality particularly since the publication of Deborah Epstein Nord’s Walking the Victorian Streets (1995) and Judith Walkowitz’s City of Dreadful Delight (1992). Considerations of categories of social power and their articulation in urban space by scholars such as Sharon Marcus in Apartment Stories (1999) and Seth Koven in Slumming (2004) articulated in precise and productive ways what has long captivated writers about the city: its density, its heterogeneity, and its precarity—and the ambivalent experience of existing in such a space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207