Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form by Claire Pettitt (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form by Claire Pettitt David E. Latané (bio) Claire Pettitt, Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xx + 456, $115/ £90 cloth. Claire Pettitt's Serial Forms (2020) was the opening volume of a trilogy of books which aims to reorient the historiography of the long nineteenth century around the concept of seriality. This second volume, Serial Revolutions, uses the revolutions of 1848 as a focal point but ranges widely, both temporally and spatially. The forthcoming third volume promises to track the rise of the digital, found in embryo in the electric telegraph in 1848, up to the ominous year 1914. As opposed to other totalizing frames (such as the rise of the middle class, the movement of peoples to cities and industries, and nationalism), seriality is more abstract and less amenable to straight narrative or statistical analysis. Pettitt's method is to use "group biography and life writing to capture the experiential dimensions of the revolutions as they were happening across Europe" (38). Her "restlessly [End Page 136] mobile people" are mostly literary Britons and Americans: Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Arthur Hugh Clough, Frederick Douglass, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Margaret Fuller, and Elizabeth Gaskell, among others (38). Many surface in multiple contexts as the revolutions and reverberations of 1848 are experienced either in person or from afar. Their serial activities—writing letters, diaries, newspaper articles, or novel parts; delivering lectures; travelling; regularly going to the window to look out—are the core of the book. Individual chapters take up, along with much else, Britons and Americans who travelled as tourists to witness Europe's revolutions; the impact of illustrated papers; representations of the ragged class; international novels; writers who witnessed the follow-on sieges in Italy; public lecture series; Emerson, Douglass, slavery, and citizenship; Browning's Casa Guidi Windows (1851); Margaret Fuller's journalism and Florentine painters; and Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities (1859). An afterword looks at Gustave Flaubert. Readers looking for an historical survey of the events of 1848 should look elsewhere. The most celebrated, though not the first, of the revolutions of 1848 occurred in Paris. After a lengthy and helpful introduction, the book opens by tracking a set of "revolutionary tourists"—men and women such as Clough, Emerson, and Fuller who rushed to Paris to witness the events in a quest that would ultimately fail, since "revolutions cannot be understood as events, but only experienced as a feeling of scalar immensity" (69). The tourists expect to witness history enacted, but they arrive in the obscurity of "mid-performance" and spend time listening to debates imperfectly understood or debating amongst themselves which restaurant to go to (61). They attend the theatre to hear the celebrity actress Rachel sing "La Marseillaise"—a reminder that a revolution in Paris is necessarily a series: 1789, 1830, 1848, 1870, 1968. The revolutionary tourists cannot help but stand apart, "never quite inhabiting this present moment" (66). "That 1848 was a failure," Pettitt notes, "remained the consensus view throughout the twentieth century, and to some extent it still persists" (12). Serial Revolutions makes numerous arguments for its lasting and mostly positive successes. Pettitt traces the negative judgment back to Karl Marx and accuses the philosopher of "blindness to the social movement around the edges, the mobility of the marginal, the improvised life of the streets" as well as to the roles of women, who are always "invisible" to him (135). She argues that Marx makes a mistake in thinking a revolution can only arise from class struggle and sees risings in 1848 as "the powerful response to a remarkable cross-class diagnosis of the political failure of governments across Europe" (4). Chapter 3, "The Ragged of Europe," might be called "The Making of the European Lumpenproletariat." One of Pettitt's achievements is to show how seriality makes the ragged visible to themselves and makes social class more important during and after 1848 [End Page 137] than Marx imagined. Her focus centers on the transnational "mysteries" of pulp literature, beginning with the "mobile serial format" of Eugène Sue's Les Mystèries de Paris (1842–43) and imitators such as...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».