Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form by Claire Pettitt (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form by Claire Pettitt David E. Latané (bio) Claire Pettitt, Serial Revolutions 1848: Writing, Politics, Form ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xx + 456, $115/ £90 cloth. Claire Pettitt's Serial Forms (2020) was the opening volume of a trilogy of books which aims to reorient the historiography of the long nineteenth century around the concept of seriality. This second volume, Serial Revolutions, uses the revolutions of 1848 as a focal point but ranges widely, both temporally and spatially. The forthcoming third volume promises to track the rise of the digital, found in embryo in the electric telegraph in 1848, up to the ominous year 1914. As opposed to other totalizing frames (such as the rise of the middle class, the movement of peoples to cities and industries, and nationalism), seriality is more abstract and less amenable to straight narrative or statistical analysis. Pettitt's method is to use "group biography and life writing to capture the experiential dimensions of the revolutions as they were happening across Europe" (38). Her "restlessly [End Page 136] mobile people" are mostly literary Britons and Americans: Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Arthur Hugh Clough, Frederick Douglass, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Margaret Fuller, and Elizabeth Gaskell, among others (38). Many surface in multiple contexts as the revolutions and reverberations of 1848 are experienced either in person or from afar. Their serial activities—writing letters, diaries, newspaper articles, or novel parts; delivering lectures; travelling; regularly going to the window to look out—are the core of the book. Individual chapters take up, along with much else, Britons and Americans who travelled as tourists to witness Europe's revolutions; the impact of illustrated papers; representations of the ragged class; international novels; writers who witnessed the follow-on sieges in Italy; public lecture series; Emerson, Douglass, slavery, and citizenship; Browning's Casa Guidi Windows (1851); Margaret Fuller's journalism and Florentine painters; and Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities (1859). An afterword looks at Gustave Flaubert. Readers looking for an historical survey of the events of 1848 should look elsewhere. The most celebrated, though not the first, of the revolutions of 1848 occurred in Paris. After a lengthy and helpful introduction, the book opens by tracking a set of "revolutionary tourists"—men and women such as Clough, Emerson, and Fuller who rushed to Paris to witness the events in a quest that would ultimately fail, since "revolutions cannot be understood as events, but only experienced as a feeling of scalar immensity" (69). The tourists expect to witness history enacted, but they arrive in the obscurity of "mid-performance" and spend time listening to debates imperfectly understood or debating amongst themselves which restaurant to go to (61). They attend the theatre to hear the celebrity actress Rachel sing "La Marseillaise"—a reminder that a revolution in Paris is necessarily a series: 1789, 1830, 1848, 1870, 1968. The revolutionary tourists cannot help but stand apart, "never quite inhabiting this present moment" (66). "That 1848 was a failure," Pettitt notes, "remained the consensus view throughout the twentieth century, and to some extent it still persists" (12). Serial Revolutions makes numerous arguments for its lasting and mostly positive successes. Pettitt traces the negative judgment back to Karl Marx and accuses the philosopher of "blindness to the social movement around the edges, the mobility of the marginal, the improvised life of the streets" as well as to the roles of women, who are always "invisible" to him (135). She argues that Marx makes a mistake in thinking a revolution can only arise from class struggle and sees risings in 1848 as "the powerful response to a remarkable cross-class diagnosis of the political failure of governments across Europe" (4). Chapter 3, "The Ragged of Europe," might be called "The Making of the European Lumpenproletariat." One of Pettitt's achievements is to show how seriality makes the ragged visible to themselves and makes social class more important during and after 1848 [End Page 137] than Marx imagined. Her focus centers on the transnational "mysteries" of pulp literature, beginning with the "mobile serial format" of Eugène Sue's Les Mystèries de Paris (1842–43) and imitators such as...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".