29 Leads To Love: New and Selected Poems by Salimah Valiani (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: 29 Leads To Love: New and Selected Poems by Salimah Valiani Corinne Sandwith (bio) SALIMAH VALIANI (2021) 29 LEADS TO LOVE: NEW AND SELECTED POEMS. TORONTO: INANNA PUBLICATIONS AND EDUCATION INC. Named the winner of the American Bookfest International Book Awards for Contemporary Poetry in 2022, 29 leads to love offers a timely invitation to explore the multiple shades and textures of radical love, the varied ways it can be approached and the many ways it can mean: love as ‘the faceless call/that only some hear’; love as ‘common as pigeons’; love as the creation of a finely-wrought bracelet and love as ‘public services’ like the Turkish Baths in Cape Town or the Plante Bath in Ottawa. Love as both ‘ever present’ and what is still yearned for; love as being in synch or going one’s own way; love as ‘doing [things] differently’ or simply taking the time to see. Exploring the multiple shapes that love can take, 29 leads to love also documents the many forces against which love is opposed–corporate rapacity, environmental and military devastation, racism and the ‘violence of the market’. As such it maps out an intricate scene of global inequalities and struggles–Iraq, Mexico, India, South Africa, Canada–while insisting on their intimate connections. ‘This longitude struggle/This longitude strife’–international struggles both past and present–are reimagined as the connective tissue, cartilage and joints of the larger body politic. The pressing concern is the search for forms of personal-political action that will transcend borders, bind and embrace; the search for ways in which the traumatic experience of ‘feeling unheld’ can be transposed into powerful forms of ‘holding together’. The ethics and politics of connection that mark these poems are to be found in their wide-ranging but intimate global reach as well as in the practice of staging intermittent dialogues with poets, musicians [End Page 129] and art-makers from a range of historical and geographical contexts. The unexpected experience of reading poems with footnotes and the parallel tactic of leaving some things unexplained also serves as an important reminder of the many things that remain opaque, distinct, not easily grasped; thus, a warning against interpretive certainty and the postures of ‘omnipotence’. Several poems, ‘Mexico City or, On Love (vii)’, ‘Cumberland 2019’, ‘On love (xxvi)’ and ‘On love (xxviii)’ explore the question of what is known to history and how this comes to be. The poems pay attention to hidden scenes and ordinary, anonymous lives; they seek to understand as well as to act against historical marginalisation and erasure and the ways in which so many are ‘barred from making history’. In the latter case, the poems take care to surface the histories of lesser known political struggles, often involving women–the ‘little known stiches’ in the carpet of global resistance which mostly go unrecognised. This tender and lucid documentation of ordinary experience often takes the form of unexplained vignettes, snapshots or extreme close ups–a device which both addresses their singularity and sets them in dialogue with comparable scenes: a woman ‘gulping, breathless/from a cup/mid-walk; a ‘woman flipping blue tortillas in a tianguis/filling them with squash flowers’; the ‘barebacked’ ballerina; the ‘worker owned/loved/run Umi café’; a ‘little boy clown balloons for buttocks/winding in traffic in search of pesos’. 29 leads to love draws the eye towards overlooked and often unloved things and asks the reader to see in new ways: it explores quiet, close-up views of an artist’s movement and coming to rest; the sun yellowing a leaf; ‘creeping red Virginias’; and ‘dusty eyes parched lips gritty teeth’. In the poem entitled ‘seeing’, the readers’ eyes are brought to rest on as ordinary an object as a table, thus asked to observe the multiple forms of community and intimacy it makes possible as well as the labour it conceals. Other poems record acts of transgressive or unorthodox re-imagining–solidity recast as space or monumental environmental features–mountains and volcanoes–taking on the value of ‘dear art’. This poetics of seeing anew is reinforced by the use of unconventional line gaps, use of white space and artful...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».