Introduction: Documenting And Debating Performance In Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
a sourcebook aLWays has TWo subJecTs: the topic it addresses and the cultural moment in which it is published.Canadian Performance Documents and Debates: A Sourcebook offers a selection of playscripts and reproduced archival materials that provide insight into theatrical activities from the seventeenth century to the early 1970s.This range of material encourages readers to consider the many ways that performance has been defined and documented over a span of more than 350 years.At the same time, this sourcebook reflects the contemporary view that communities, confederations, colonies, and nations are mutable concepts-social experiments with everchanging and often-contested ideological parameters and protocols.Our intention has not been to create a definitive, or even a comprehensive, historical overview of the country's theatrical past, but rather to facilitate twenty-first-century debates about how performance and its material remnants can raise important, yet vexing, questions about "Canada" in its many permutations.To help pursue the double focus of this volume, an impressive group of leading and emerging scholars, artists, and arts administrators has been gathered.The result is a vibrant and varied mix of voices and perspectives that complements the diversity of tones, styles, and convictions conveyed through the performance documents examined in this collection.Some of the contributors were invited to provide new English translations of theatrical texts in acknowledgement that translations are always historically situated and interpretative.Others were asked to write introductions for each chapter as a way to rethink the artistic and sociopolitical significance of well-known plays and theatrical events.Still others were requested to write introductions to initiate conversations about documents and modes of performance that traditionally have not received much attention.Indeed, several of the primary sources included in the collection are appearing in print for the first time.The contributors highlight several issues and themes that will resonate with contemporary readers.Several discuss a sense of apprehension about gender and race that is present in the documents they introduce.Others foreground how economic factors have tacitly determined the feasibility and contours of creativity.Still others grapple with how government agendas and political allegiances have impacted human rights as well as artistic expression.The mobility of ideas is also broached by some contributors who explore how theatrical trends that circulated transculturally were localized and then relaunched.While many of these topics reflect the perspectives of the people that is cohesively "Canadian in spirit" (vii).The achievement of that spirit is challenged by two pressing issues: that "Our theatres are under alien influences" and that "We accept in the main what Broadway sends us" (v).In short, Massey articulates qualms voiced by several subsequent anthology editors: a desire to contribute to the formation of a singular, unified national theatre in the face of perceived foreign cultural dominance and a lack of nature: "In January 1972 I was asked to join a growing but still fledgling organization whose aim was to develop and promote B.C. plays.This organization was the New Play Centre and from my first meeting with its founders, Sheila Neville and Douglas Bankson, I became swept up in the fervour surrounding the Canadian Playwright.This fervour, born out of a new national awareness Before proceeding further, it is worth noting that the phrase "the lands now known as Canada" is neither straightforward nor without debate.In fact, perhaps one of the most controversial aspects of this volume for twenty-firstcentury readers will be the use of the word "Canada."A collection of theatrical performance documents that extends back to 1606 needs to acknowledge that over the four centuries covered in this volume, the meaning of "Canada" and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».