Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Discourses are not once and for all subservient to power or raised up against it, any more than silences are…Discourse transmits and produces power; it reinforces it, but also undermines and exposes it, renders it fragile and makes it possible to thwart it.In like manner, silence and secrecy are a shelter for power, anchoring its prohibitions; but they also loosen its holds and provide for relatively obscure areas of tolerance.1 -Michel Foucault eing silenced and being silent can be very different experiences.While the former is typically represented as censorship, a tool of oppression, the latter can be a place of resistance.Silence can also be simultaneously liberating and oppressive.This ambiguity of silence is outlined in Michel Foucault's History of Sexuality.For Foucault, silence, which includes "the things one declines to say, or is forbidden to name, the discretion that is required between different speakers" is an essential component of discourse, and cannot be separated from the power relationships therein. 2 Silence is not "the absolute limit of discourse," but rather exists in relationship with the things that are 1.Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction, trans.Robert Hurley (New York: Vintage-Random House, 1978), 100-101.2. Foucault, History of Sexuality, 27.B uttered. 3 Alongside discourse and power, silence, for Foucault, is non-binary, relational, contingent, and always shifting.4 There are many kinds of silence, and each can be used in various ways to various ends.This paper examines how Roman Catholic women in the United States engage silence as a form of resistance in their relationship with the Catholic Church, to manage their own fertility.This silence involves the use of proscribed methods of birth control and a corresponding rejection of the obligation to confess this impropriety to the Church.This paper suggests that utilizing discretion while contravening papal authority on contraceptives allows many American Catholic women private control over their own fertility and reproductive health, without provoking significant opposition or criticism from the Church.However, to participate in such a silence requires a certain amount of privilege among lay Catholics, including the ability to access birth control products and information outside of the purview of Catholic institutions, as well as the resources to afford such products.This privilege of privacy is becoming increasingly elusive to many women and their families seeking access to contraceptives, as Catholic hospitals increase in number and influence in the United States while maintaining restrictions on contraceptive provisions.Moreover, an increase in Catholic control of reproductive healthcare is related to this silent resistance, because, as the laity maintains a silence on birth control, the Catholic Church in turn remains free from public opposition.Therefore, while certain individuals may benefit from such a resistance, many others will be hindered in their access to contraceptive information and resources.This paper is a thought 3.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,090 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,014 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».