Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Extract It is a privilege to contribute a brief foreword to this timely collection, brilliantly conceived, edited and introduced by Sarah R. Bin Tyeer and Claire Gallien, and brought to fruition despite the acute challenges presented by 2020 and 2021. Bridging polarities – aesthetic and political, historical and theoretic – this volume interrogates Weltliteratur via Islamicate imaginaries, confronting abstract complexities while revealing rich compositional specifics. Central to the collection is a vision of Islamicate letters as ‘always and already’ global in scope; as Bin Tyeer and Gallien explore in their elegant introduction, the primary sources illumined anew in this edition represent World Literatures before and beyond standard scholarly frames that have been belatedly applied from the ‘Global North’. This final phrase, implying a specifically hemispheric consciousness and critique, is aptly foregrounded in Islam and New Directions in World Literature. Invoking influential voices such as Aamir Mufti, the volume opens by articulating its aim to ‘move beyond monocentric tendencies of World Literature’ in recognition especially of the ‘field’ as it is ‘now defined in the Global North’. It is this regional classification, charting broad zones of contact and inquiry, that I find especially intriguing. A Canadian, with rural Ontario roots, I have dedicated my own career to considering together Islamicate and North American letters, spanning lost Arabic manuscripts authored by enslaved West African Muslims, to the deep debts owed by classic New England authors to Persian Sufi poetry. The ‘Global North’ lineages of World Literature, as rightly recognised by Bin Tyeer and Gallien, implicate J. W. Goethe especially, whose receptions of Ḥāfiẓ were foundational to the field’s formalising – receptions which later catalysed much Comparative Literature scholarship, including, admittedly, my own.1 As a literary critic concerned with Qurʾānic legacies, but who is biographically ‘northern’, I find compelling the hemispheric shifts theorised by Bin Tyeer and Gallien, and performed practically within the chapters of Islam and New Directions in World Literature. However, the present collection’s ‘monocentric’ critique invites us not only to broaden out beyond the ‘Global North’, I think, but to reimagine what this region might yet signify, attending to traditions of the North too often neglected within both Comparative Literature and Islamic Studies. In my mind, it is not only inter-hemispheric, but intra-hemispheric vistas, that are potentially opened by Islam and New Directions in World Literature. As the collection articulates in its introduction, Goethean legacies have long contoured the field’s conceptualisation, linking Weltliteratur to the ‘Global North’ as well as ‘western Europe’. But, thousands of miles northwest of Weimar, during the very decades that Goethe was reading Ḥāfiẓ, Muslim sources were inspiring other rich afterlives. As anticipated by the title to my foreword, it was at the utmost inhabited boundaries of the northern hemisphere that Islamicate imaginaries would also receive fresh expression, rendered for readers of Inuit languages.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».