MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Foreword

2022· book-chapter· en· W4386962592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey Eınboden

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryIslamPoliticsLiteraturePolitical scienceArtLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extract It is a privilege to contribute a brief foreword to this timely collection, brilliantly conceived, edited and introduced by Sarah R. Bin Tyeer and Claire Gallien, and brought to fruition despite the acute challenges presented by 2020 and 2021. Bridging polarities – aesthetic and political, historical and theoretic – this volume interrogates Weltliteratur via Islamicate imaginaries, confronting abstract complexities while revealing rich compositional specifics. Central to the collection is a vision of Islamicate letters as ‘always and already’ global in scope; as Bin Tyeer and Gallien explore in their elegant introduction, the primary sources illumined anew in this edition represent World Literatures before and beyond standard scholarly frames that have been belatedly applied from the ‘Global North’. This final phrase, implying a specifically hemispheric consciousness and critique, is aptly foregrounded in Islam and New Directions in World Literature. Invoking influential voices such as Aamir Mufti, the volume opens by articulating its aim to ‘move beyond monocentric tendencies of World Literature’ in recognition especially of the ‘field’ as it is ‘now defined in the Global North’. It is this regional classification, charting broad zones of contact and inquiry, that I find especially intriguing. A Canadian, with rural Ontario roots, I have dedicated my own career to considering together Islamicate and North American letters, spanning lost Arabic manuscripts authored by enslaved West African Muslims, to the deep debts owed by classic New England authors to Persian Sufi poetry. The ‘Global North’ lineages of World Literature, as rightly recognised by Bin Tyeer and Gallien, implicate J. W. Goethe especially, whose receptions of Ḥāfiẓ were foundational to the field’s formalising – receptions which later catalysed much Comparative Literature scholarship, including, admittedly, my own.1 As a literary critic concerned with Qurʾānic legacies, but who is biographically ‘northern’, I find compelling the hemispheric shifts theorised by Bin Tyeer and Gallien, and performed practically within the chapters of Islam and New Directions in World Literature. However, the present collection’s ‘monocentric’ critique invites us not only to broaden out beyond the ‘Global North’, I think, but to reimagine what this region might yet signify, attending to traditions of the North too often neglected within both Comparative Literature and Islamic Studies. In my mind, it is not only inter-hemispheric, but intra-hemispheric vistas, that are potentially opened by Islam and New Directions in World Literature. As the collection articulates in its introduction, Goethean legacies have long contoured the field’s conceptualisation, linking Weltliteratur to the ‘Global North’ as well as ‘western Europe’. But, thousands of miles northwest of Weimar, during the very decades that Goethe was reading Ḥāfiẓ, Muslim sources were inspiring other rich afterlives. As anticipated by the title to my foreword, it was at the utmost inhabited boundaries of the northern hemisphere that Islamicate imaginaries would also receive fresh expression, rendered for readers of Inuit languages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7230.688

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207