THU591 HyperAldosteronism In Pregnancy Predicted Impacts (H.A.P.P.I.): A Retrospective Cohort Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: D. Oprea: None. F. Lefrançois: None. A.C. Côté: None. M. Roy-Lacroix: None. M. St-Jean: None. N. Sauvé: None. Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are increasing worldwide and are associated with a high rate of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a frequent and reversible cause of secondary hypertension in young non-pregnant women (18%) (1). Until now, no studies have detailed the prevalence, nor the outcomes associated with PA during pregnancy. Research Question: In HDP, are cases of PA associated with different impacts on maternal-fetal health compared to pregnant women without PA? Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared 252 pregnancies according to their PA status. We included pregnancies that were followed at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) between 2011 and 2022, and who had had an aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) screening for PA, in a five-year period before or after the analyzed pregnancy. Monofetal and twin pregnancies were included. Concomitant diagnoses of pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism or Cushing syndrome were excluded. The primary objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of HDP in women with PA. Secondary objectives were to describe maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes and compare them according to PA status. Results: Among 252 pregnancies, 15 were diagnosed with a PA (concerning 12 women). Our preliminary analysis showed a greater prevalence of advanced maternal age (53.3% vs 24.5, p = 0.028) and Afro-American ethnicity (60.0 % vs 10.1%, p < 0.001) in the PA group, in addition to a tendency towards class I obesity (40.0% vs 13.1%, p = 0.166) in this group. There were no differences in terms of prevalence of chronic hypertension (26.7% vs 25.7 %, p = 0.936), delivery mode and overall fetal morbidity and mortality. Although not statistically significant, preeclamspia tended to be more frequent (40.0% vs 27.0%, p = 0.276) and gestational hypertension less frequent (0.0 % vs 16.0%, p = 0.092) during pregnancy in the PA group. 40.1% (vs 19.0%, p = 0.052) of PA-associated HDP were diagnosed in post-partum (including 33.4 % of preeclampsia in this group) and required intravenous hypertensive treatment (40.0% vs 23.2%, p = 0.209). Also, 13.3% of pregnancies in the PA group (vs. 3.0 %, p = 0.093) required hospitalization at the intensive care unit (ICU). All cases of PA were diagnosed within 5 years pre-conception or post-partum. Conclusion: Pregnancies with PA diagnosis within a five-year period tended to present more frequently with HDP as preeclampsia, especially in the post-partum period, and often required more intensive antihypertensive treatment and ICU hospitalization. The upcoming second prospective phase of this study will better assess the prevalence of PA in pregnant women experiencing HDP. Reference: (1) Alam S. et al., Clin Endocrinol, June 2021;94(6):895903. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».