THU591 HyperAldosteronism In Pregnancy Predicted Impacts (H.A.P.P.I.): A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: D. Oprea: None. F. Lefrançois: None. A.C. Côté: None. M. Roy-Lacroix: None. M. St-Jean: None. N. Sauvé: None. Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are increasing worldwide and are associated with a high rate of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a frequent and reversible cause of secondary hypertension in young non-pregnant women (18%) (1). Until now, no studies have detailed the prevalence, nor the outcomes associated with PA during pregnancy. Research Question: In HDP, are cases of PA associated with different impacts on maternal-fetal health compared to pregnant women without PA? Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared 252 pregnancies according to their PA status. We included pregnancies that were followed at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) between 2011 and 2022, and who had had an aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) screening for PA, in a five-year period before or after the analyzed pregnancy. Monofetal and twin pregnancies were included. Concomitant diagnoses of pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism or Cushing syndrome were excluded. The primary objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of HDP in women with PA. Secondary objectives were to describe maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes and compare them according to PA status. Results: Among 252 pregnancies, 15 were diagnosed with a PA (concerning 12 women). Our preliminary analysis showed a greater prevalence of advanced maternal age (53.3% vs 24.5, p = 0.028) and Afro-American ethnicity (60.0 % vs 10.1%, p < 0.001) in the PA group, in addition to a tendency towards class I obesity (40.0% vs 13.1%, p = 0.166) in this group. There were no differences in terms of prevalence of chronic hypertension (26.7% vs 25.7 %, p = 0.936), delivery mode and overall fetal morbidity and mortality. Although not statistically significant, preeclamspia tended to be more frequent (40.0% vs 27.0%, p = 0.276) and gestational hypertension less frequent (0.0 % vs 16.0%, p = 0.092) during pregnancy in the PA group. 40.1% (vs 19.0%, p = 0.052) of PA-associated HDP were diagnosed in post-partum (including 33.4 % of preeclampsia in this group) and required intravenous hypertensive treatment (40.0% vs 23.2%, p = 0.209). Also, 13.3% of pregnancies in the PA group (vs. 3.0 %, p = 0.093) required hospitalization at the intensive care unit (ICU). All cases of PA were diagnosed within 5 years pre-conception or post-partum. Conclusion: Pregnancies with PA diagnosis within a five-year period tended to present more frequently with HDP as preeclampsia, especially in the post-partum period, and often required more intensive antihypertensive treatment and ICU hospitalization. The upcoming second prospective phase of this study will better assess the prevalence of PA in pregnant women experiencing HDP. Reference: (1) Alam S. et al., Clin Endocrinol, June 2021;94(6):895903. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".