Geographical Distribution of Library Software and Systems
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Objective: The study aimed to determine the geographical distribution of the library software and systems in different regions of the world. Methodology: The descriptive-analytical method used. The statistical population included all the libraries whose information is entered to International Guide Website of Lib-Web-Cats (library websites and catalogs), 60986 libraries. A researcher-made checklist used as a data collection tool. Findings: On the average, the maximum number of the public libraries (956), the private libraries (31), the collegiate libraries (190), the medical libraries (14) and the law libraries (10) were located in the Pacific Region. On the average, Canada and the USA had the maximum number of school libraries, about 1100 libraries. The average number of research and art libraries in the 6 regions of the country was very low and approximately, zero. These regions were not similar in terms of the type of the libraries and the tools being used in each one. In other words, there was a relation between the region and the type of the library and the tools being used in each library of that specific region. Also, these regions were similar in terms of the total number of the libraries; i.e. there was no relation between the type of the region and the total number of the libraries. Discussion and Conclusion: It could be concluded that the type and number of the libraries in different regions of the world varied according to different privileging conditions of the societies existing in these regions. The type of the tools being applied in each library was different according to the specific geographical region. It would be interesting to mention that the geographical region had no influence on the total number of the libraries, which shows that the focus in all regions was on meeting the customers' needs rather than making a quantified set and complex of libraries. Innovation: According to the reviews and researches conducted, it seems that no comprehensive Research has been done on comparing library systems throughout the world. This Research provides a perspective on the application of library systems in different regions of the world and presents interesting results. Keywords: Library System, Information Systems, Library Software, Lib-Web-Cats, Geographical distribution.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,123 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle