MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387751399 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000953892.59221.8e

S1063 Improvement in Inflammatory Biomarker Levels Through Week 12 in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients Treated With Guselkumab: Results From the Phase 3 QUASAR Induction Study

2023· article· en· W4387751399 sur OpenAlexaff
Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Axel Dignaß, Kuan‐Hsiang Gary Huang, Matthew Germinaro, Nicole Houck, Miao Ye, Hongyan Zhang, Marjorie Argollo, Ken Takeuchi, Rafał Filip, Jessica R. Allegretti, Brian G. Feagan, Bruce E. Sands

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGastroenterologyCalprotectinInternal medicineUlcerative colitisC-reactive proteinFecesPlaceboBiomarkerInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationPathologyDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FeCal) are non-invasive inflammatory biomarkers used to assess disease activity in UC. The Phase 3 QUASAR induction study evaluated efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23 p19 subunit antagonist, in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC. Here, we analyze the effect of GUS treatment on CRP and FeCal through Week (Wk) 12 in pts with elevated CRP and/or FeCal at baseline (BL). Methods: Pts with a modified Mayo score of 5-9 and a Mayo endoscopy subscore ≥2 at BL were randomized 3:2 to receive either GUS 200mg IV or placebo (PBO) IV at Wks0, 4, and 8. CRP and FeCal were assessed at BL, Wk4, Wk8 (for CRP only), and Wk12. All analyses were not multiplicity controlled (nominal P-values). Results: Of 701 pts assessed, nearly 50% had a history of inadequate response/intolerance to advanced therapies (ADT) for UC; 47.4% of these pts had inadequate response/intolerance to ≥2 ADT classes. Median BL concentrations of CRP and FeCal were similar between the GUS- and PBO-treated pts (4.34 vs 3.83mg/L and 1651 vs 1606mg/kg, respectively). The proportions of pts with elevated CRP/FeCal at BL were similar between treatment groups. Compared with PBO, greater reductions in CRP and FeCal were observed with GUS at the earliest timepoint assessed (Wk4) and continued through Wk12 (Table 1). Among pts with elevated CRP ( >3mg/L), median change from BL in CRP concentration (mg/L) at Wk12 for the GUS and PBO cohorts were -3.99 and -0.51mg/L, respectively ( P< 0.001); the proportions of pts achieving 50% and 75% reduction in CRP levels (or ≤3mg/L) at Wk12 were higher for GUS-treated pts than those receiving PBO (59.7% vs 28.1% and 47.2% vs 19.4%; both P< 0.001). Among pts with elevated FeCal (>250mg/kg), median change from BL in FeCal concentration (mg/kg) at Wk12 were -800 and -86mg/kg for the GUS and PBO cohorts, respectively (P< 0.001); the proportions of pts achieving 50% and 75% reduction in FeCal levels (or ≤250 mg/kg) at Wk12 were higher for GUS-treated pts than those receiving PBO (51.1% vs 33.8% and 41.4% vs 23.6%; both P< 0.001). At Wk12, GUS-treated pts achieved CRP≤3mg/L and/or FeCal≤250mg/kg at higher rates than PBO-treated pts (Figure 1). Conclusion: Pts with moderately to severely active UC and elevated inflammatory markers treated with GUS 200mg IV induction showed greater improvement from BL in both CRP and FeCal levels compared with PBO. Differences were observed as early as the first assessments at Wk4 and continued through Wk12. Table 1. - Change from baseline in CRP and FeCal through Week 12 among patients with elevated CRP (>3mg/L) or FeCal (>250mg/kg) at baseline Placebo IV Guselkumab 200 mg IV CRP (mg/L) Baseline, N 160 248 Median [IQR] 8.02 [5.40; 16.85] 9.26 [5.31; 18.05] Wk 4, N 158 245 Median change from baseline [IQR] -2.06 [-5.70; 1.58] -3.35 [-8.60; -0.23]*** Wk 8, N 156 239 Median change from baseline [IQR] -1.75 [-5.68; 1.46] -3.80 [-10.77; -0.19]*** Wk 12, N 153 239 Median change from baseline [IQR] -0.51 [-4.64; 2.72] -3.99 [-11.46; -0.85]*** FeCal (mg/kg) Baseline, N 225 333 Median [IQR] 1743 [1120; 3395] 1787 [920; 4009] Wk 4, N 213 308 Median change from baseline [IQR] -227 [-1041; 658] -603 [-1866; 230]*** Wk 12, N 201 293 Median change from baseline [IQR] -86 [-1254; 504] -800 [-2532; 0]*** ***Nominal P≤0.001. Patients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or an AE of worsening of UC or other reasons except for COVID-19 related reasons (excluding COVID-19 infection) or regional crisis in Russia and Ukraine prior to the designated timepoint had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. The P-values of treatment comparison were based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures with CRP and FeCal values being log-transformed. Figure 1.: Proportions of patients achieving CRP ≤3 mg/L and FeCal ≤250 mg/kg through Week 12 among patients with elevated CRP (>3mg/L) or FeCal (>250mg/kg) at baseline.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetInflammatory Bowel Disease→Travaux en français237 207→