The world politics of social investment: Volume II. Julian L.Garritzmann (Ed.), SiljaHäusermann (Ed.), BrunoPalier (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022. £64 (hardback). <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9780197601457
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The World Politics of Social Investment: Volume II (Garritzmann et al., 2022) brings together leading scholars to produce a comprehensive analysis of social investment reforms in a global perspective. Building on Volume I (Garritzmann et al., 2022) – which focussed on the explanatory variables – Volume II explores the interaction between the explanatory variables and the dependent variable: social investment strategies. In Chapter 1 the authors review two dimensions of social investment strategies: functions (skill creation, preservation, and mobilisation) and distributive profiles (inclusive, stratified, and targeted). These dimensions help to define and measure social investment, a concept which has been criticised for lacking a clear definition, and to facilitate comparisons drawn from the empirical chapters. The first chapters (Part I) illustrate that the Scandinavian countries continue to follow an inclusive strategy, even if this is showing cracks, and remain social investment exemplars (Chapter 2). In contrast, social investment is underdeveloped in the liberal welfare regimes of Canada and the US, with the former following a mixed stratified/targeted and the latter a targeted strategy (Chapter 6). The chapters in Part I - which also include Germany (Chapter 3) and southern Europe (Chapters 4 and 5) - emphasise that policy legacies, public opinion, partisan politics and fiscal stability contribute to divergent social investment strategies in Western Europe and North America. The chapters on Central and Eastern Europe (Part II) argue that social investment strategies depend on different growth strategies. In the Baltic countries, illustrated most clearly by Estonia, reforms have been designed to create human capital through investments in education to support the transition to high-skill, knowledge-based economies (Chapters 7 and 9). In contrast, the Visegrád four have opted for re-industrialisation and FDI led growth while favouring compensatory over social investment policies to satisfy the losers of economic transition (Chapters 8 and 9).The following chapters on North East Asia (Part III) highlight that both welfare state legacies and growth strategies have converged to produce welfare states with lean social protection, weakening the constraint of pre-exiting commitments and thus providing the fiscal space to expand social investment (Chapters 10–13). South Korea has gone furthest, particularly through investments in early childhood education and care (Chapter 13), with neighbouring countries more tentatively moving in the direction of social investment. Faced with aging societies and falling birth rates, policymakers in the region have turned to social investment as a solution to demographic challenges. Finally, the chapters on Latin America (Part IV) show that policy legacies may constrain the expansion of social investment (Chapter 14) and that the design and delivery of Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) are influenced by the strength and ideology of political parties in government (Chapters 15 and 16). Common to these cases has been the use of CCTs as an instrument to reduce poverty and social exclusion – generally reflecting a targeted strategy. Throughout the empirical chapters subnational territories (regions and municipalities) emerge as important actors: in North America, Québec stands out in for its inclusive social investment strategy (Chapter 6); in Germany, reforms to tracking in secondary education have occurred at the Länder rather than the federal level (Chapter 3); in the Baltics, the fiscal and policy autonomy of municipalities contributes to divergence in the provision of early childhood education and care (Chapter 7) and in Latin America, CCTs frequently have their origins in programmes developed in subnational territories (Chapters 14 and 15). The findings suggest that subnational territories are more crucial to social investment than is recognised by the book's editors. The expansion of service-oriented social investment, in which responsibility for service provision is typically devolved or decentralised to subnational territories, calls into question the usefulness of countries (and global regions) as the unit of analysis and requires that future research better account for the territorial aspect of the welfare state. Overall, the theoretical framework which guides the empirical chapters is comprehensive and coherence is maintained throughout the book. In the conclusion, the editors convincingly synthesise the findings from the diverse empirical chapters to present a typology of welfare state reform strategies which helps us to make sense of social investment reform trends (Chapter 17). The World Politics of Social Investment: Volume II is essential reading for students and scholars of the welfare state.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».