Novel nicotine products: Averting a harmful revolution
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The implementation of policies to regulate tobacco advertising is one of the most cost-effective measures to fight against smoking and the nicotine consumption epidemic.As outlined in Article 13 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 1 , these policies should spread over all forms of commercial communication that directly or indirectly promote any novel nicotine product or its use.However, for over a decade, the use of novel nicotine products has spread around the world, including products such as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), heated tobacco products (HTPs), and nicotine pouches, among others.The recent irruption of these products into the market sector exposed a loophole in the legislation.The tobacco industry has taken advantage of it by advertising and promoting these new forms of nicotine consumption like any other consumer product.Some examples can be found as explicit advertising or as product placement in films, television, social media, and sports sponsorships 2,3 .This loophole exploitation is one of the main factors that has contributed to the popularity and increased consumption of these novel nicotine products in recent years, especially in the younger population 4,5 .The situation escalated reaching such a point that four years ago the use of ENDS among youth was declared an epidemic in the USA 6 .Although some laws exist 7 , in some cities of Europe we could still find ENDS and HTP advertising in public areas, such as those found in London this spring or Girona (Catalonia) right before the pandemic, besides non-compliance with the anti-smoking regulation (Figures 1A and 1B).Furthermore, the tradition continues as shops selling novel tobacco products sometimes have point-of-sale promotion displaying unregulated full-sized advertisements in the front window, as found in Vienna this summer (Figure 1D) and in Florence in 2022 (Figure 1C), or digital advertising that can still be found on the Internet as of today (Figure 1D).Advertisements remain a trigger that favors the consumption of novel nicotine products, which can have lasting harmful effects on health 8 , especially when exposed from a very early age 9 .Instead of decreasing the prospects of smoking conventional tobacco, the use of novel nicotine products seems to increase its likelihood, particularly among youth 10 .This reflects the importance of public health surveillance and the implementation of prevention and control programs.Measures such as limiting where and how they are advertised and sold could help mitigate the effects on today's youth, preventing consumption in future generations.Despite the emerging new policies regulating novel nicotine products in Europe, Canada, and the USA, most existing strategies targeted conventional tobacco.Nonetheless, recently new advances are being made to properly regulate them in some EU member states 5 , a trend others should follow.Explicit and up-to-date advertising regulations of novel nicotine products, adapting to anticipate the commercial interests of tobacco companies, are
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».