Novel nicotine products: Averting a harmful revolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The implementation of policies to regulate tobacco advertising is one of the most cost-effective measures to fight against smoking and the nicotine consumption epidemic.As outlined in Article 13 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 1 , these policies should spread over all forms of commercial communication that directly or indirectly promote any novel nicotine product or its use.However, for over a decade, the use of novel nicotine products has spread around the world, including products such as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), heated tobacco products (HTPs), and nicotine pouches, among others.The recent irruption of these products into the market sector exposed a loophole in the legislation.The tobacco industry has taken advantage of it by advertising and promoting these new forms of nicotine consumption like any other consumer product.Some examples can be found as explicit advertising or as product placement in films, television, social media, and sports sponsorships 2,3 .This loophole exploitation is one of the main factors that has contributed to the popularity and increased consumption of these novel nicotine products in recent years, especially in the younger population 4,5 .The situation escalated reaching such a point that four years ago the use of ENDS among youth was declared an epidemic in the USA 6 .Although some laws exist 7 , in some cities of Europe we could still find ENDS and HTP advertising in public areas, such as those found in London this spring or Girona (Catalonia) right before the pandemic, besides non-compliance with the anti-smoking regulation (Figures 1A and 1B).Furthermore, the tradition continues as shops selling novel tobacco products sometimes have point-of-sale promotion displaying unregulated full-sized advertisements in the front window, as found in Vienna this summer (Figure 1D) and in Florence in 2022 (Figure 1C), or digital advertising that can still be found on the Internet as of today (Figure 1D).Advertisements remain a trigger that favors the consumption of novel nicotine products, which can have lasting harmful effects on health 8 , especially when exposed from a very early age 9 .Instead of decreasing the prospects of smoking conventional tobacco, the use of novel nicotine products seems to increase its likelihood, particularly among youth 10 .This reflects the importance of public health surveillance and the implementation of prevention and control programs.Measures such as limiting where and how they are advertised and sold could help mitigate the effects on today's youth, preventing consumption in future generations.Despite the emerging new policies regulating novel nicotine products in Europe, Canada, and the USA, most existing strategies targeted conventional tobacco.Nonetheless, recently new advances are being made to properly regulate them in some EU member states 5 , a trend others should follow.Explicit and up-to-date advertising regulations of novel nicotine products, adapting to anticipate the commercial interests of tobacco companies, are
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".