Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A Retrospective View of La corónica's First Ten Years John Lihani, Founding Editor [This article first appeared in 1982 in vol. 11, no. 1 of La corónica, pp. 124–28] Now that La corónica has completed its tenth year of publication, the response to it among medievalists engaged in the study of Spanish language and literature has been most gratifying. It has been the good fortune of La corónica to receive enthusiastic support from its very inception. It was conceived to serve its specific readership as the best possible clearing house for literary commentary, lively ideas, and interesting and informative reports on personalia. The fact that this journal and newsletter is circulated in eighteen countries (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, West Germany, Great Britain, Holland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and, of course, the United States) is testimony to the fact that the academic members of the profession are in agreement with its function as originally envisaged to foment a cohesiveness among Hispanomedievalists. As one reviews the pages of the past twenty issues of La corónica, one can observe a steady increase in professional activity along with a broader scope in content and regular changes in the devoted editorial staffs. The list of names of all those new as well as experienced scholars to whom we are indebted for contributing to the success of this periodical is unsurprisingly a rather extensive one. Many of these notable names are already found throughout the issues of La corónica, and each and every number deservedly carries its grateful list of acknowledgements. Perhaps one of the quickest ways of acknowledging La corónica's debts to all concerned would be simply to call attention to the names of the contributors appearing in the ten-year index (compiled by the editorial assistant, Ann D. Miletich, in collaboration with John S. Miletich and Alan Deyermond, the idea for which was first suggested by Russell V. Brown). To commemorate the tenth anniversary, we might recall that the idea for a periodical was conceived at the Modern Language Association Convention [End Page 10] held in Chicago in 1971. At that time, the Executive Committee of Spanish 1, the Medieval Language and Literature Section, consisted of V. R. B. Oelschläger, Dana Nelson, Carmelo Gariano, and Herschel J. Prey, who served as chairman. This committee was responsible for engendering two other committees: 1) the continuing Executive Committee, with additional members—Julio Rodríguez Puértolas and James Burke—with Dana Nelson as the new chairman, and 2) the newly established Bibliography and Research Committee. It was Dana Nelson of the University of Arizona who activated the idea of a newsletter and carefully nurtured the Bibliography and Research Committee, which was tasked with the responsibility for the birth of La corónica. The Bibliography and Research Committee counted on the essential services of Peter Dunn (SUNY, Buffalo; now at Wesleyan University), Harold G. Jones (University of Missouri, now at University of Houston), Richard P. Kinkade (Emory University, now at University of Arizona), Thomas Montgomery (Tulane University), Harvey L. Sharrer (University of California, Santa Barbara), and John Lihani (University of Kentucky), chairman. From June to December of 1972, each member of the committee worked assiduously on that first issue (see plate 12) in order to accomplish his assignment in advance of the date of the MLA meeting, which was designated as the unofficial deadline for the inaugural issue. The first, or founding, editor's files reveal 168 separate items of correspondence written for the newsletter during that intense interval when a working week of sixty-five to seventy hours was a normal schedule. Dana Nelson selected the resonant name of La corónica, and tried vainly to obtain funds from various sources to launch the publication. No such funds were forthcoming, and we had to accept the hard fact that there would be no budgetary assistance for the newsletter. Nevertheless, despite the absolute lack of funds, and perhaps all too naively, we progressed with the idea, determined to devote the needed effort in time and labor in order to make the newsletter a reality. We were convinced that once the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».