MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387988046 · doi:10.1353/cor.2021.a910104

A Retrospective View of La corónica 's First Ten Years

2021· article· en· W4387988046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Lihani

Bibliographic record

Venue˜La œcorónica/˜La œCorónica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudience measurementHistoryPolitical scienceLibrary scienceClassicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Retrospective View of La corónica's First Ten Years John Lihani, Founding Editor [This article first appeared in 1982 in vol. 11, no. 1 of La corónica, pp. 124–28] Now that La corónica has completed its tenth year of publication, the response to it among medievalists engaged in the study of Spanish language and literature has been most gratifying. It has been the good fortune of La corónica to receive enthusiastic support from its very inception. It was conceived to serve its specific readership as the best possible clearing house for literary commentary, lively ideas, and interesting and informative reports on personalia. The fact that this journal and newsletter is circulated in eighteen countries (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, West Germany, Great Britain, Holland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and, of course, the United States) is testimony to the fact that the academic members of the profession are in agreement with its function as originally envisaged to foment a cohesiveness among Hispanomedievalists. As one reviews the pages of the past twenty issues of La corónica, one can observe a steady increase in professional activity along with a broader scope in content and regular changes in the devoted editorial staffs. The list of names of all those new as well as experienced scholars to whom we are indebted for contributing to the success of this periodical is unsurprisingly a rather extensive one. Many of these notable names are already found throughout the issues of La corónica, and each and every number deservedly carries its grateful list of acknowledgements. Perhaps one of the quickest ways of acknowledging La corónica's debts to all concerned would be simply to call attention to the names of the contributors appearing in the ten-year index (compiled by the editorial assistant, Ann D. Miletich, in collaboration with John S. Miletich and Alan Deyermond, the idea for which was first suggested by Russell V. Brown). To commemorate the tenth anniversary, we might recall that the idea for a periodical was conceived at the Modern Language Association Convention [End Page 10] held in Chicago in 1971. At that time, the Executive Committee of Spanish 1, the Medieval Language and Literature Section, consisted of V. R. B. Oelschläger, Dana Nelson, Carmelo Gariano, and Herschel J. Prey, who served as chairman. This committee was responsible for engendering two other committees: 1) the continuing Executive Committee, with additional members—Julio Rodríguez Puértolas and James Burke—with Dana Nelson as the new chairman, and 2) the newly established Bibliography and Research Committee. It was Dana Nelson of the University of Arizona who activated the idea of a newsletter and carefully nurtured the Bibliography and Research Committee, which was tasked with the responsibility for the birth of La corónica. The Bibliography and Research Committee counted on the essential services of Peter Dunn (SUNY, Buffalo; now at Wesleyan University), Harold G. Jones (University of Missouri, now at University of Houston), Richard P. Kinkade (Emory University, now at University of Arizona), Thomas Montgomery (Tulane University), Harvey L. Sharrer (University of California, Santa Barbara), and John Lihani (University of Kentucky), chairman. From June to December of 1972, each member of the committee worked assiduously on that first issue (see plate 12) in order to accomplish his assignment in advance of the date of the MLA meeting, which was designated as the unofficial deadline for the inaugural issue. The first, or founding, editor's files reveal 168 separate items of correspondence written for the newsletter during that intense interval when a working week of sixty-five to seventy hours was a normal schedule. Dana Nelson selected the resonant name of La corónica, and tried vainly to obtain funds from various sources to launch the publication. No such funds were forthcoming, and we had to accept the hard fact that there would be no budgetary assistance for the newsletter. Nevertheless, despite the absolute lack of funds, and perhaps all too naively, we progressed with the idea, determined to devote the needed effort in time and labor in order to make the newsletter a reality. We were convinced that once the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜La œcorónica/˜La œCorónicaSame topicEarly Modern Spanish LiteratureFrench-language works237,207