41 Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Beef-Sired Steers Born to Holstein Dams
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot growth performance and carcass characteristics of F1 beef × Holstein steers (n = 124) sired by commercially available Angus (n = 19 from 7 sires), Charolais (n = 79 from 3 sires), SimAngus (n = 16 from 3 sires), or Wagyu (n = 10 from 2 sires) bulls. Male calves born from May to August of 2021, were sourced from 8 Pennsylvania dairy herds. Steers were raised by a commercial calf grower until April of 2021 (10.5 ± 1.5 months of age). Steers were then moved to the PA Department of Agriculture’s Livestock Evaluation Center (LEC) and transitioned to a high-energy ration. Individual feed intake was monitored using the GrowSafe Feed Intake Monitoring System (Model 4000E, Vytelle, Calgary AB, Canada). Steers were slaughtered after 90, 118, or 153 days on feed at the LEC. Pulls were based on a combination of visual appraisal and body weight. Linear models of growth performance traits and carcass characteristics included the fixed effects of sire breed, herd of origin, and birthdate. Binomial models of USDA Quality Grades and Yield Grades included a fixed effect of sire breed. Angus-sired steers were heaviest at feedlot entry (P < 0.01) and were on feed for the fewest days (P < 0.01). Angus × Holstein steers were heavier at slaughter (P < 0.01) than SimAngus and Wagyu-sired steers. Wagyu-sired steers had the least dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and carcass ADG (P < 0.01) when compared with progeny of other sire breeds. No differences in gain to feed intake (G:F(; P = 0.90), back-calculated carcass G:F (P = 0.62), net energy of metabolism (P = 0.70) and net energy of gain (P = 0.70), nor hip height at harvest (P = 0.14) were detected between sire breeds. Wagyu × Holstein carcasses were the lightest (P < 0.01) and had the least amount of backfat (P = 0.01). Dressing percentage tended to be least (P = 0.10) in Charolais × Holstein carcasses (60.5%) and greatest in SimAngus × Holstein carcasses (61.7%); carcasses from Angus and Wagyu-sired steers were intermediate and not different. About 84% of Angus × Holstein carcasses graded Choice while only 31% of SimAngus × Holstein carcasses graded Choice (P = 0.03). However, there were no differences in called marbling scores between sire breeds (P = 0.15). Charolais × Holstein tended to have the lowest proportion (4%) of Yield Grade 1 carcasses (P = 0.05). Angus-sired steers were on feed for the fewest days when compared with steers sired by other beef breeds. Wagyu × Holstein steers had reduced ADG, DMI, and subsequent carcass weight in comparison with compared steers of other sire breeds.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».