MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387999526 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad341.045

41 Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Beef-Sired Steers Born to Holstein Dams

2023· article· en· W4387999526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bailey L Basiel, T. L. Felix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeedlotSireAnimal scienceBreedHerdCrossbreedMarbled meatBeef cattleBiologyCarcass weightDry matterBody weightLoinVeterinary medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare feedlot growth performance and carcass characteristics of F1 beef × Holstein steers (n = 124) sired by commercially available Angus (n = 19 from 7 sires), Charolais (n = 79 from 3 sires), SimAngus (n = 16 from 3 sires), or Wagyu (n = 10 from 2 sires) bulls. Male calves born from May to August of 2021, were sourced from 8 Pennsylvania dairy herds. Steers were raised by a commercial calf grower until April of 2021 (10.5 ± 1.5 months of age). Steers were then moved to the PA Department of Agriculture’s Livestock Evaluation Center (LEC) and transitioned to a high-energy ration. Individual feed intake was monitored using the GrowSafe Feed Intake Monitoring System (Model 4000E, Vytelle, Calgary AB, Canada). Steers were slaughtered after 90, 118, or 153 days on feed at the LEC. Pulls were based on a combination of visual appraisal and body weight. Linear models of growth performance traits and carcass characteristics included the fixed effects of sire breed, herd of origin, and birthdate. Binomial models of USDA Quality Grades and Yield Grades included a fixed effect of sire breed. Angus-sired steers were heaviest at feedlot entry (P < 0.01) and were on feed for the fewest days (P < 0.01). Angus × Holstein steers were heavier at slaughter (P < 0.01) than SimAngus and Wagyu-sired steers. Wagyu-sired steers had the least dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and carcass ADG (P < 0.01) when compared with progeny of other sire breeds. No differences in gain to feed intake (G:F(; P = 0.90), back-calculated carcass G:F (P = 0.62), net energy of metabolism (P = 0.70) and net energy of gain (P = 0.70), nor hip height at harvest (P = 0.14) were detected between sire breeds. Wagyu × Holstein carcasses were the lightest (P < 0.01) and had the least amount of backfat (P = 0.01). Dressing percentage tended to be least (P = 0.10) in Charolais × Holstein carcasses (60.5%) and greatest in SimAngus × Holstein carcasses (61.7%); carcasses from Angus and Wagyu-sired steers were intermediate and not different. About 84% of Angus × Holstein carcasses graded Choice while only 31% of SimAngus × Holstein carcasses graded Choice (P = 0.03). However, there were no differences in called marbling scores between sire breeds (P = 0.15). Charolais × Holstein tended to have the lowest proportion (4%) of Yield Grade 1 carcasses (P = 0.05). Angus-sired steers were on feed for the fewest days when compared with steers sired by other beef breeds. Wagyu × Holstein steers had reduced ADG, DMI, and subsequent carcass weight in comparison with compared steers of other sire breeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAgriculture, Soil, Plant ScienceFrench-language works237,207