Editorial: Mental health in correctional and criminal justice systems (CCJS): exploring how diagnosis, treatment and cultural differences impact pathway through the CCJS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In regard to the treatment of prisoners with mental disorders, a policy document from the World Health Organization 'Good governance for prison health in the 21st century' (5) recommends that the health care of prisoners should be supervised by government in the same way as the general population. This is also in keeping with the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners -the Mandela Rules. Rule 24 states that 'the provision of health care for prisoners is a state responsibility' and that 'prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the community, and should have access to necessary health-care services free of charge without discrimination on the grounds of their legal status' (6). Few studies have examined the mental health care received by prisoners. Another issue is deaths which occur while in prison custody or shortly afterwards. This is an ongoing issue that needs to be resolved, with more research, and better understanding of interventions required to improve the situation (7)(8)(9).Where studies have been undertaken they have indicated the needs for treatment of prisoners for mental health disorders have often not been identified and treatment needs have not been met (10,11). Few studies have examined what factors impact the pathway through the criminal justice system in terms of treatment received and whether needs were met, although some have suggested poorer outcomes for people from ethnic minority groups (12). Another largely unexplored area is the extent to which the treatment needs of prisoners discharged from prison are handed over to appropriate mental health services in the community (13).Simpson et al (2022) conducted a systematic review of publications investigating mental health services in the correctional framework. In regard to those passing through the correctional system, they found no evidence for standardised assessment approaches, some evidence to support specific psychosocial interventions and relatively weak evidence to support reintegration methods back into the community.Other contributors to our topic have added to what is known. Linked to the theme of the effectiveness of interventions for those passing through the criminal justice system, Yesuf et al looked at the prevalence of mental illness among inmates in north-western Ethiopia. They found around 75% of inmates had some form of mental disorder with symptoms including feeling unhappy and finding it difficult to play an important role in life. However those that took part in rehabilitation activities had an improved outcome. The authors concluded that this was an area for further research and development that could lead to better outcomes for those with symptoms of mental disorder.Stawinska-Witoszynska et al found a high level of generalised anxiety disorders (GAD) in the population of inmates detained in one of the largest penitentiary units in north-eastern Poland. They found a three times higher prevalence of GAD among inmates detained in a closed type prison compared with those in an open prison. They made the case for increased availability of psychological therapies for prisoners.Another theme of this topic is whether care is sufficiently integrated between the criminal justice system and community based services. McIntosh et al conducted a mental health needs assessment for Scotland's prison population. They concluded that existing provision to support the mental health needs of people in prison in Scotland was inadequate. This was partly due to a lack of integrated care between the justice, health and social work systems resulting in prisoners not receiving the support they needed both during and following imprisonment.In line with another topic theme some research has been undertaken on treatment options for different mental health conditions seen in prisons in various countries. Sekiguchi et al looked at treatment options for persistent methamphetamine associated psychosis and how this should be distinguished from schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They found benefits from using a lower dose antipsychotic to treat methamphetamine associated psychosis. Naidoo et al in a study based on a women's correctional centre in South Africa emphasised the need to educate, support and manage those infected with HIV which has a high prevalence in South Africa. In Canadian based studies, Moghimi et al explored the mental health needs of correctional workers and found, Moghimi et al (2), digital mental health care interventions could help meet these needs. Shafti et al Shafti et al (2) explored the relationship between aggressive behaviours and self-harm and implications for managing such behaviour in correctional settings.In terms of other themes of this research topic such as whether an individual's needs for treatment and care are successfully handed over to community-based services and the impact of the quality of care on the likelihood of recidivism more research is needed. As noted by Skipworth et al, a study in New Zealand indicated that there has been an increasingly poor outcome in terms of imprisonment following discharge from a mental health unit over a ten-year period and concluded that models of community based mental health care may be increasingly reliant on the criminal justice system to manage aggressive and dangerous behaviour among those with mental illness. There have been reports of similar trends in other countries including the UK.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,033 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,021 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».