MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388086972 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1293060

Editorial: Mental health in correctional and criminal justice systems (CCJS): exploring how diagnosis, treatment and cultural differences impact pathway through the CCJS

2023· editorial· en· W4388086972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nigel McKenzie, Andrew Forrester

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminal justiceMental healthPsychiatryForensic psychiatryPsychologyMedicineCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In regard to the treatment of prisoners with mental disorders, a policy document from the World Health Organization 'Good governance for prison health in the 21st century' (5) recommends that the health care of prisoners should be supervised by government in the same way as the general population. This is also in keeping with the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners -the Mandela Rules. Rule 24 states that 'the provision of health care for prisoners is a state responsibility' and that 'prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the community, and should have access to necessary health-care services free of charge without discrimination on the grounds of their legal status' (6). Few studies have examined the mental health care received by prisoners. Another issue is deaths which occur while in prison custody or shortly afterwards. This is an ongoing issue that needs to be resolved, with more research, and better understanding of interventions required to improve the situation (7)(8)(9).Where studies have been undertaken they have indicated the needs for treatment of prisoners for mental health disorders have often not been identified and treatment needs have not been met (10,11). Few studies have examined what factors impact the pathway through the criminal justice system in terms of treatment received and whether needs were met, although some have suggested poorer outcomes for people from ethnic minority groups (12). Another largely unexplored area is the extent to which the treatment needs of prisoners discharged from prison are handed over to appropriate mental health services in the community (13).Simpson et al (2022) conducted a systematic review of publications investigating mental health services in the correctional framework. In regard to those passing through the correctional system, they found no evidence for standardised assessment approaches, some evidence to support specific psychosocial interventions and relatively weak evidence to support reintegration methods back into the community.Other contributors to our topic have added to what is known. Linked to the theme of the effectiveness of interventions for those passing through the criminal justice system, Yesuf et al looked at the prevalence of mental illness among inmates in north-western Ethiopia. They found around 75% of inmates had some form of mental disorder with symptoms including feeling unhappy and finding it difficult to play an important role in life. However those that took part in rehabilitation activities had an improved outcome. The authors concluded that this was an area for further research and development that could lead to better outcomes for those with symptoms of mental disorder.Stawinska-Witoszynska et al found a high level of generalised anxiety disorders (GAD) in the population of inmates detained in one of the largest penitentiary units in north-eastern Poland. They found a three times higher prevalence of GAD among inmates detained in a closed type prison compared with those in an open prison. They made the case for increased availability of psychological therapies for prisoners.Another theme of this topic is whether care is sufficiently integrated between the criminal justice system and community based services. McIntosh et al conducted a mental health needs assessment for Scotland's prison population. They concluded that existing provision to support the mental health needs of people in prison in Scotland was inadequate. This was partly due to a lack of integrated care between the justice, health and social work systems resulting in prisoners not receiving the support they needed both during and following imprisonment.In line with another topic theme some research has been undertaken on treatment options for different mental health conditions seen in prisons in various countries. Sekiguchi et al looked at treatment options for persistent methamphetamine associated psychosis and how this should be distinguished from schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They found benefits from using a lower dose antipsychotic to treat methamphetamine associated psychosis. Naidoo et al in a study based on a women's correctional centre in South Africa emphasised the need to educate, support and manage those infected with HIV which has a high prevalence in South Africa. In Canadian based studies, Moghimi et al explored the mental health needs of correctional workers and found, Moghimi et al (2), digital mental health care interventions could help meet these needs. Shafti et al Shafti et al (2) explored the relationship between aggressive behaviours and self-harm and implications for managing such behaviour in correctional settings.In terms of other themes of this research topic such as whether an individual's needs for treatment and care are successfully handed over to community-based services and the impact of the quality of care on the likelihood of recidivism more research is needed. As noted by Skipworth et al, a study in New Zealand indicated that there has been an increasingly poor outcome in terms of imprisonment following discharge from a mental health unit over a ten-year period and concluded that models of community based mental health care may be increasingly reliant on the criminal justice system to manage aggressive and dangerous behaviour among those with mental illness. There have been reports of similar trends in other countries including the UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0210.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207