MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388677148 · doi:10.1353/com.2023.a911953

The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh by Michel Foucault (review)

2023· article· en· W4388677148 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œComparatist/Comparatist · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFleshHuman sexualityMichel foucaultPhilosophySubject (documents)LiteratureArt historyArtSociologyPoliticsGender studiesLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh by Michel Foucault Daniel J. Schultz Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh. Ed. Frédéric Gros. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 2021. 416 pages. When Volumes 2 and 3 of Michel Foucault's The History of Sexuality appeared in 1984, a publisher's insert announced the imminent arrival of a fourth volume, Confessions of the Flesh. The text was advertised as dealing "with the experience of the flesh in the first centuries of Christianity, and with the role played in it by the hermeneutic, and purifying decipherment, of desire" (vii). Foucault died in June 1984, and the promised fourth and final volume, scheduled to appear in October of that year, did not arrive. Daniel Defert, Foucault's longtime partner, had the unfinished manuscript placed in a bank vault where it sat for over three decades. Until now. [End Page 413] After its long repose in the vault, Histoire de la sexualité 4: Les aveux de la chair has seen the light of day; the unfinished French manuscript, edited by Frédéric Gros, was published by Gallimard in 2018. In 2021, Robert Hurley's English translation was released: The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh (Pantheon). The English text is the subject of this review essay. Before his death, Foucault declared "no posthumous publication." To his intimate acquaintances, he remarked, "don't pull a Max Brod on me," referring to Kafka's literary executor who famously disobeyed Kafka's wish to have all his unpublished writings burned. Initially, Foucault's directive was interpreted to mean no posthumous publication; nearly forty years out, it is now taken to mean publish everything. How did we get here? The interpretive thaw and slow reversal began in 1994, when the massive four volume edition of Dits et écrits was published (later brought into English in an abbreviated three volume Essential Works). This included interviews, essays, reviews, lectures, and other assorted writings, all of which had been published in Foucault's lifetime (and thus in technical conformity with the prohibition on publication). Around the same time, bootleg transcriptions of publicly accessible recordings of Foucault's lecture course material began circulating. Given that the recordings were already accessible, the decision was made to produce officially authorized high quality transcriptions complete with scholarly editorial apparatuses. To do this scholars and editorial teams received permission from Defert and Foucault's family to consult the original course manuscripts to fill in and smooth out the audio transcription. The floodgates were opened. The result has been the publication, beginning in the late nineties and extending into the 2010s of all thirteen Collège de France lecture courses. Publication now continues unabated of other courses, lectures, and seminars he delivered in places such as Louvain, Berkeley, Vermont, Toronto, and Dartmouth to name just a few. The decision to publish Confessions of the Flesh emerged in this context. It is worth pausing here to note the allure of the existence of an unread Foucault manuscript sitting in a bank vault and the way it stages readerly desire around a forbidden object, a promise, and a secret. It is tempting to imagine that he wrote this volume precisely so it wouldn't be published, wouldn't be read—the unread Volume 4, the talisman that unlocks the mysteries of Volumes 2 and 3. One can imagine this unread text as a coda to Volume 1, a provocation, a joke, a feint, a play, a way for us to think that our liberation is at stake in being able to read it. Is this not precisely the readerly posture Foucault anticipates in the opening pages of The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction [La volonté de savoir], where he ambushes the reader's desire for a story of sexual liberation through a parodic rehearsal of the repressive hypothesis? "For a long time, the story goes. …" (3). In her essay "Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value," Gayatri Spivak [End Page 414] reminds us that "one of the determinations of the question of value is the predication of the subject," adding...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,625
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,100
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œComparatist/ComparatistMême sujetHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesTravaux en français237 207