MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388677148 · doi:10.1353/com.2023.a911953

The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh by Michel Foucault (review)

2023· article· en· W4388677148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œComparatist/Comparatist · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFleshHuman sexualityMichel foucaultPhilosophySubject (documents)LiteratureArt historyArtSociologyPoliticsGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh by Michel Foucault Daniel J. Schultz Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh. Ed. Frédéric Gros. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 2021. 416 pages. When Volumes 2 and 3 of Michel Foucault's The History of Sexuality appeared in 1984, a publisher's insert announced the imminent arrival of a fourth volume, Confessions of the Flesh. The text was advertised as dealing "with the experience of the flesh in the first centuries of Christianity, and with the role played in it by the hermeneutic, and purifying decipherment, of desire" (vii). Foucault died in June 1984, and the promised fourth and final volume, scheduled to appear in October of that year, did not arrive. Daniel Defert, Foucault's longtime partner, had the unfinished manuscript placed in a bank vault where it sat for over three decades. Until now. [End Page 413] After its long repose in the vault, Histoire de la sexualité 4: Les aveux de la chair has seen the light of day; the unfinished French manuscript, edited by Frédéric Gros, was published by Gallimard in 2018. In 2021, Robert Hurley's English translation was released: The History of Sexuality, Volume 4: Confessions of the Flesh (Pantheon). The English text is the subject of this review essay. Before his death, Foucault declared "no posthumous publication." To his intimate acquaintances, he remarked, "don't pull a Max Brod on me," referring to Kafka's literary executor who famously disobeyed Kafka's wish to have all his unpublished writings burned. Initially, Foucault's directive was interpreted to mean no posthumous publication; nearly forty years out, it is now taken to mean publish everything. How did we get here? The interpretive thaw and slow reversal began in 1994, when the massive four volume edition of Dits et écrits was published (later brought into English in an abbreviated three volume Essential Works). This included interviews, essays, reviews, lectures, and other assorted writings, all of which had been published in Foucault's lifetime (and thus in technical conformity with the prohibition on publication). Around the same time, bootleg transcriptions of publicly accessible recordings of Foucault's lecture course material began circulating. Given that the recordings were already accessible, the decision was made to produce officially authorized high quality transcriptions complete with scholarly editorial apparatuses. To do this scholars and editorial teams received permission from Defert and Foucault's family to consult the original course manuscripts to fill in and smooth out the audio transcription. The floodgates were opened. The result has been the publication, beginning in the late nineties and extending into the 2010s of all thirteen Collège de France lecture courses. Publication now continues unabated of other courses, lectures, and seminars he delivered in places such as Louvain, Berkeley, Vermont, Toronto, and Dartmouth to name just a few. The decision to publish Confessions of the Flesh emerged in this context. It is worth pausing here to note the allure of the existence of an unread Foucault manuscript sitting in a bank vault and the way it stages readerly desire around a forbidden object, a promise, and a secret. It is tempting to imagine that he wrote this volume precisely so it wouldn't be published, wouldn't be read—the unread Volume 4, the talisman that unlocks the mysteries of Volumes 2 and 3. One can imagine this unread text as a coda to Volume 1, a provocation, a joke, a feint, a play, a way for us to think that our liberation is at stake in being able to read it. Is this not precisely the readerly posture Foucault anticipates in the opening pages of The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction [La volonté de savoir], where he ambushes the reader's desire for a story of sexual liberation through a parodic rehearsal of the repressive hypothesis? "For a long time, the story goes. …" (3). In her essay "Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value," Gayatri Spivak [End Page 414] reminds us that "one of the determinations of the question of value is the predication of the subject," adding...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œComparatist/ComparatistSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207