MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388950429 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2023.a913081

Introduction

2023· article· en· W4388950429 sur OpenAlex
Simi Kang, Lisa Sun-Hee Park

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnvironmentalismContext (archaeology)IndigenousEnvironmental ethicsEnvironmental justiceSociologyEconomic JusticePolitical scienceMedia studiesHistoryPoliticsLawEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Simi Kang (bio) and Lisa Sun-Hee Park (bio) A note from the editors: The contents of this issue are inevitably shaped by the editors' engagements with these fields. As two people approaching this work with significant privileges as well as specific experiences of marginalization based on our education, relationship to communities, and personal identities, we know that our subject positions contribute to how we assembled and framed the work you find here. We also recognize that this special issue addresses a limited scope of environmental injustices and responses thereto. We know that many voices are missing and go unacknowledged, particularly those of frontlines communities. We hope that in recognizing these gaps and omissions, we can encourage you, our readers, to view the materials with this context in mind and, further, can nudge others to foster more accessible platforms for highlighting practitioner expertise at the intersections of environmental justice work and Asian American studies. It is therefore our hope that you will see these pages as a place to continue your engagement with environmental justice work and that this issue offers some tools for you in the work to come. [End Page 303] the worldbriefly sees usonly afterthe eyeof a stormsees us –Craig Santos Perez, "Disaster Haiku, after cyclone winston" after typhoon yutu after hurricane maria after …," in Habitat Threshold1 This special issue on 'Environmental Entanglements in Asian America' brings together central frameworks within Asian Americanist, Pacific Islander, and Indigenous critiques to bear on our understanding of the environment and environmentalism. Each of the articles brings together complex analytical and experiential threads—be they multi-species, trans- and intranational, ancestral and intergenerational, polytemporal, and post/colonial—that bind us and yet have largely been ignored or denied. Refusing these linkages prevents us from seeing how solidarities might be configured not merely around an allegiance to a species, identity, or nation, but also through shared and often vexed histories of extraction, access, movement, suppression, scarcity, privilege, abundance, and erasure. Organizers and scholars of the global majority have advanced communitycentered work on environmental in/justice for generations. However, bringing those modes of resistance and inquiry into the discipline of Asian American studies is a relatively recent project. While we recognize that we are writing at an important moment of expansion in this area, the goal of this issue is not to predetermine a bordered subfield called Asian American and Pacific Islander environmental justice studies. Rather, we wish to "write to you from the middle of something"2 by highlighting five contributions to this critical conversation. Recognizing our "from-the-middle-ness," we argue that "the call for environmental justice is part of a broader call to revisit our covenant to the world, our relationships to it, and our responsibilities to one another."3 We began writing this introduction in the days following four SCOTUS rulings4 that emphasized the United States' continued investment in protecting whiteness and wealth. As the Supreme Court rejected the Navajo Nation's request for a federal assessment of its water needs, the continent experienced the deadliest heat wave in history and wildfire smoke exceeded borders, making the air unsafe for all beings across Canada and the northern US.5 While SCOTUS wrote opinions against Black, Latinx, and Indigenous youth,6 hundreds of refugees of Pakistan's 2022 floods perished at the hands of smugglers and [End Page 304] Greece's coast guard in the Mediterranean. That small business owners were reassured they could discriminate against queer and trans people as Biden greenlit the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline through Appalachia says a great deal about whose lives matter to the state. These actions are deeply political, particularly when interrogated through the lens of environmental justice, which is a Black, Indigenous, and POC-driven movement that "affirms the sacredness of Mother Earth, ecological unity and the interdependence of all species, and the right to be free from ecological destruction."7 To achieve environmental justice, we must see our personal, communal, ecosystem-level, and cultural health as intimately interdependent with our larger communities, which always includes racialized folks, more-than-human beings, and the lands and waters we all rely on...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,866
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,651

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,330 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle