MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388950429 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2023.a913081

Introduction

2023· article· en· W4388950429 on OpenAlex
Simi Kang, Lisa Sun-Hee Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmentalismContext (archaeology)IndigenousEnvironmental ethicsEnvironmental justiceSociologyEconomic JusticePolitical scienceMedia studiesHistoryPoliticsLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Simi Kang (bio) and Lisa Sun-Hee Park (bio) A note from the editors: The contents of this issue are inevitably shaped by the editors' engagements with these fields. As two people approaching this work with significant privileges as well as specific experiences of marginalization based on our education, relationship to communities, and personal identities, we know that our subject positions contribute to how we assembled and framed the work you find here. We also recognize that this special issue addresses a limited scope of environmental injustices and responses thereto. We know that many voices are missing and go unacknowledged, particularly those of frontlines communities. We hope that in recognizing these gaps and omissions, we can encourage you, our readers, to view the materials with this context in mind and, further, can nudge others to foster more accessible platforms for highlighting practitioner expertise at the intersections of environmental justice work and Asian American studies. It is therefore our hope that you will see these pages as a place to continue your engagement with environmental justice work and that this issue offers some tools for you in the work to come. [End Page 303] the worldbriefly sees usonly afterthe eyeof a stormsees us –Craig Santos Perez, "Disaster Haiku, after cyclone winston" after typhoon yutu after hurricane maria after …," in Habitat Threshold1 This special issue on 'Environmental Entanglements in Asian America' brings together central frameworks within Asian Americanist, Pacific Islander, and Indigenous critiques to bear on our understanding of the environment and environmentalism. Each of the articles brings together complex analytical and experiential threads—be they multi-species, trans- and intranational, ancestral and intergenerational, polytemporal, and post/colonial—that bind us and yet have largely been ignored or denied. Refusing these linkages prevents us from seeing how solidarities might be configured not merely around an allegiance to a species, identity, or nation, but also through shared and often vexed histories of extraction, access, movement, suppression, scarcity, privilege, abundance, and erasure. Organizers and scholars of the global majority have advanced communitycentered work on environmental in/justice for generations. However, bringing those modes of resistance and inquiry into the discipline of Asian American studies is a relatively recent project. While we recognize that we are writing at an important moment of expansion in this area, the goal of this issue is not to predetermine a bordered subfield called Asian American and Pacific Islander environmental justice studies. Rather, we wish to "write to you from the middle of something"2 by highlighting five contributions to this critical conversation. Recognizing our "from-the-middle-ness," we argue that "the call for environmental justice is part of a broader call to revisit our covenant to the world, our relationships to it, and our responsibilities to one another."3 We began writing this introduction in the days following four SCOTUS rulings4 that emphasized the United States' continued investment in protecting whiteness and wealth. As the Supreme Court rejected the Navajo Nation's request for a federal assessment of its water needs, the continent experienced the deadliest heat wave in history and wildfire smoke exceeded borders, making the air unsafe for all beings across Canada and the northern US.5 While SCOTUS wrote opinions against Black, Latinx, and Indigenous youth,6 hundreds of refugees of Pakistan's 2022 floods perished at the hands of smugglers and [End Page 304] Greece's coast guard in the Mediterranean. That small business owners were reassured they could discriminate against queer and trans people as Biden greenlit the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline through Appalachia says a great deal about whose lives matter to the state. These actions are deeply political, particularly when interrogated through the lens of environmental justice, which is a Black, Indigenous, and POC-driven movement that "affirms the sacredness of Mother Earth, ecological unity and the interdependence of all species, and the right to be free from ecological destruction."7 To achieve environmental justice, we must see our personal, communal, ecosystem-level, and cultural health as intimately interdependent with our larger communities, which always includes racialized folks, more-than-human beings, and the lands and waters we all rely on...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it