Assessing the maternal transfer of Lactobacilli to the intestine of CD‐1 murine fetuses.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rationale Recent research suggests that the fetus is not sterile; Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria have been detected in the human placenta, umbilical cord and meconium. In addition, maternally administered probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during weeks 30–36 of gestation has been recovered from the feces of offspring up to 24 months of age. Similarly, in mice, Enterococcus faecium has been found in the meconium of pups whose mothers received the bacterium during pregnancy. However, this area of research is still at its infancy and mechanisms underlying maternal transfer of microorganisms still need investigation. Objective To assess whether there is maternal transfer of lactobacilli to the fetus during gestation. Study Design & Methods 6‐week old female CD‐1 Elite (specific pathogen free) mice were randomized to receive probiotic Lacidofil® (a mixture of L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052 in a 95:5 ratio) (1×10 9 CFU/mL, P; n= 6) or nothing (control, C; n= 4) in their drinking water for 1 week prior to mating and throughout pregnancy. Dams were sacrificed at E19 (full gestation) and the umbilical cord, and fetal small and large intestine were collected. All procedures were conducted in a sterile facility; mice received sterile chow and water and were dissected in a biosafety cabinet. DNA from collected tissues was isolated and digital droplet PCR used to quantify total bacteria and lactobacilli while L. rhamnosus R0011 was analyzed by qPCR with strain‐specific primers. Results Body weight increased throughout pregnancy independently of probiotic administration, and litter size did not differ between groups (C, 12±0.41 fetuses; P, 11.83±0.54 fetuses; p = 0.83). Lactobacilli were found in all tissues studied with no difference in % lactobacilli (normalized to total bacteria) between control and probiotic‐treated dams in umbilical cord (C, 55.32 ± 10.70%; P, 46.00 ± 13.04%; p = 0. 0.6008), fetal small (C, 25.66 ± 6.528%; P, 27.62 ± 4.463%; p =0.8025) and large (C, 37.26 ± 2.781%; P, 38.88 ± 5.270%; p = 0.8214) intestine. However, the specific strain L. rhamnosus R0011 was detected in the large intestine of fetuses derived from 50% of the probiotic‐treated dams (2.06×10 5 CFU/g – 8.55×10 8 CFU/g) but not in controls. Future studies will assess the microbiome of other tissues. Conclusion These data suggest that Lactobacillus may be a predominant genus in the umbilical cord and fetal gut at term. The presence of Lactobacillus DNA in the fetal intestine supports the emerging concept of in utero microbial exposure and the role it may play in health. Future studies will assess the viability of these bacteria. Although there were differences in the outcomes for maternal transfer of probiotic L. rhamnosus R0011 to the fetuses, these preliminary results provide proof that vertical transfer of microorganisms occur during gestation and that this can be modified by diet. Support or Funding Information Funding: ‐NSERC Discovery Grant to EMC. ‐Lallemand Health Solutions donation in support of research program to EMC ‐AH is the recipient of a NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship for Master's (CGSM) ‐SES is the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) ‐PMS is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP‐89894 and IOP‐92890) ‐EMC holds the Lawson Family Chair in Microbiome Nutrition Research at the University of Toronto.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».