MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Assessing the maternal transfer of Lactobacilli to the intestine of CD‐1 murine fetuses.

2017· article· en· W4389020296 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ashkan Hashemi, Kathene C. Johnson‐Henry, Amel Taïbi, Sara Stinson, Thomas A. Tompkins, Philip M. Sherman, Elena M. Comelli

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsLallemand (Canada)Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEMC
KeywordsLactobacillus rhamnosusBiologyGestationFetusLitterUmbilical cordMeconiumProbioticMicrobiologyOffspringPregnancyAndrologyPhysiologyAmniotic fluidBacteriaImmunologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale Recent research suggests that the fetus is not sterile; Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria have been detected in the human placenta, umbilical cord and meconium. In addition, maternally administered probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during weeks 30–36 of gestation has been recovered from the feces of offspring up to 24 months of age. Similarly, in mice, Enterococcus faecium has been found in the meconium of pups whose mothers received the bacterium during pregnancy. However, this area of research is still at its infancy and mechanisms underlying maternal transfer of microorganisms still need investigation. Objective To assess whether there is maternal transfer of lactobacilli to the fetus during gestation. Study Design & Methods 6‐week old female CD‐1 Elite (specific pathogen free) mice were randomized to receive probiotic Lacidofil® (a mixture of L. rhamnosus R0011 and L. helveticus R0052 in a 95:5 ratio) (1×10 9 CFU/mL, P; n= 6) or nothing (control, C; n= 4) in their drinking water for 1 week prior to mating and throughout pregnancy. Dams were sacrificed at E19 (full gestation) and the umbilical cord, and fetal small and large intestine were collected. All procedures were conducted in a sterile facility; mice received sterile chow and water and were dissected in a biosafety cabinet. DNA from collected tissues was isolated and digital droplet PCR used to quantify total bacteria and lactobacilli while L. rhamnosus R0011 was analyzed by qPCR with strain‐specific primers. Results Body weight increased throughout pregnancy independently of probiotic administration, and litter size did not differ between groups (C, 12±0.41 fetuses; P, 11.83±0.54 fetuses; p = 0.83). Lactobacilli were found in all tissues studied with no difference in % lactobacilli (normalized to total bacteria) between control and probiotic‐treated dams in umbilical cord (C, 55.32 ± 10.70%; P, 46.00 ± 13.04%; p = 0. 0.6008), fetal small (C, 25.66 ± 6.528%; P, 27.62 ± 4.463%; p =0.8025) and large (C, 37.26 ± 2.781%; P, 38.88 ± 5.270%; p = 0.8214) intestine. However, the specific strain L. rhamnosus R0011 was detected in the large intestine of fetuses derived from 50% of the probiotic‐treated dams (2.06×10 5 CFU/g – 8.55×10 8 CFU/g) but not in controls. Future studies will assess the microbiome of other tissues. Conclusion These data suggest that Lactobacillus may be a predominant genus in the umbilical cord and fetal gut at term. The presence of Lactobacillus DNA in the fetal intestine supports the emerging concept of in utero microbial exposure and the role it may play in health. Future studies will assess the viability of these bacteria. Although there were differences in the outcomes for maternal transfer of probiotic L. rhamnosus R0011 to the fetuses, these preliminary results provide proof that vertical transfer of microorganisms occur during gestation and that this can be modified by diet. Support or Funding Information Funding: ‐NSERC Discovery Grant to EMC. ‐Lallemand Health Solutions donation in support of research program to EMC ‐AH is the recipient of a NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship for Master's (CGSM) ‐SES is the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) ‐PMS is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP‐89894 and IOP‐92890) ‐EMC holds the Lawson Family Chair in Microbiome Nutrition Research at the University of Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→