Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Nirsevimab for the Prevention of RSV Disease in Immunocompromised Children Aged ≤24 Months: Music, an Open Label, Phase 2 Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Immunocompromised children are at increased risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), which can lead to poor outcomes, including death. Nirsevimab, an extended half-life monoclonal antibody that targets the RSV prefusion F protein, is approved in Canada, the EU, Great Britain, and the US for the prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants during their first RSV season. In Canada and the US, approval extends to the second season for children remaining at higher risk for severe RSV disease. Here, we present the full analysis of the MUSIC trial (NCT04484935), a 12-month, Phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled, single-dose study of nirsevimab, designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and emergence of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in immunocompromised children ≤24 months of age. Methods Children aged ≤24 months with ≥1 immunocompromising condition received a single intramuscular injection of nirsevimab 50 mg (if weight <5 kg) or 100 mg (if weight ≥5 kg) prior to their first RSV season or 200 mg if entering their second RSV season (Table 1). Safety, ADA, and PK were evaluated to Day 361 (final database lock April 18, 2023). Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) included immediate hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis), immune complex disease, or thrombocytopenia. Results One hundred children (first RSV season n=46, second RSV season n=54) were enrolled from 8 countries (Table 1). Immunocompromising conditions included primary immunodeficiency (n=33), systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy, (n=29), immunosuppressive chemotherapy, (n=20), history of organ or bone marrow transplantation (n=16), other immunosuppressive therapy (n=15), and human immunodeficiency virus infection (n=8; children may have had more than one condition). Six children experienced 8 treatment-related adverse events (AEs; pyrexia n=4, abdominal pain n=1, erythema n=1, rash n=2); all were Grade 1 severity , except 1 event of Grade 2 pyrexia, and occurred within 7 days of dosing. No treatment-related serious AEs or new onset chronic diseases were observed. Six AESIs were reported in 5 children; all were Grade 1 hypersensitivity events limited to cutaneous findings (food allergy n=2, contrast media allergy n=1, urticaria n=2, erythema n=1), with 1 considered treatment-related (erythema). Three deaths occurred (LRTI, septic shock, and suspected tumor hemorrhage); all were determined to be unrelated to treatment. Eleven children developed treatment-emergent ADAs (median titer 200.0; Day 31 n=1, Day 151 n=1, and Day 361 n=9); none experienced a treatment-related serious AE, AESI, or skin hypersensitivity reaction. Of the children who were ADA-positive on Day 361, 1 experienced a treatment-related AE (Grade 1 pyrexia within 60 minutes of dosing), and 1 experienced a Grade 1 rash on Day 104, determined to be unrelated to treatment. Children who were ADA-positive on Day 361 were more likely to have nirsevimab levels below the limit of detection versus ADA-negative children, suggesting an influence of ADA on PK between Days 151 and 361. Nirsevimab serum exposures at Day 151 were similar to levels demonstrated to be effective in preventing medically attended RSV LRTI in healthy children enrolled in the Phase 3 MELODY trial (Figure 1). Fourteen children demonstrated a rapid decline in serum concentrations through Day 151 compared with the rest of the children; a review of their medical histories revealed evidence for protein-losing conditions, including graft versus host disease, chronic liver disease, and nephrotic syndrome, in 9 of the 14 children. Although none met protocol-defined case criteria for medically attended RSV LRTI, 3 children had an RSV-positive LRTI (central or local test) requiring medical attendance (in an inpatient or outpatient setting; all after Day 151), of whom 1 was hospitalized. Conclusions In immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months, a single dose of nirsevimab was well tolerated and no safety concerns arose over 361 days. Levels of ADA were low, with minimal effects on PK and no apparent impact on safety outcomes. Nirsevimab serum exposure was consistent with previous studies in healthy children and supportive of efficacy in this population at risk of severe RSV disease. Some children with underlying protein-losing conditions had a rapid decline in nirsevimab serum concentrations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».