Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Nirsevimab for the Prevention of RSV Disease in Immunocompromised Children Aged ≤24 Months: Music, an Open Label, Phase 2 Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Immunocompromised children are at increased risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), which can lead to poor outcomes, including death. Nirsevimab, an extended half-life monoclonal antibody that targets the RSV prefusion F protein, is approved in Canada, the EU, Great Britain, and the US for the prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants during their first RSV season. In Canada and the US, approval extends to the second season for children remaining at higher risk for severe RSV disease. Here, we present the full analysis of the MUSIC trial (NCT04484935), a 12-month, Phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled, single-dose study of nirsevimab, designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and emergence of antidrug antibodies (ADA) in immunocompromised children ≤24 months of age. Methods Children aged ≤24 months with ≥1 immunocompromising condition received a single intramuscular injection of nirsevimab 50 mg (if weight <5 kg) or 100 mg (if weight ≥5 kg) prior to their first RSV season or 200 mg if entering their second RSV season (Table 1). Safety, ADA, and PK were evaluated to Day 361 (final database lock April 18, 2023). Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) included immediate hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis), immune complex disease, or thrombocytopenia. Results One hundred children (first RSV season n=46, second RSV season n=54) were enrolled from 8 countries (Table 1). Immunocompromising conditions included primary immunodeficiency (n=33), systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy, (n=29), immunosuppressive chemotherapy, (n=20), history of organ or bone marrow transplantation (n=16), other immunosuppressive therapy (n=15), and human immunodeficiency virus infection (n=8; children may have had more than one condition). Six children experienced 8 treatment-related adverse events (AEs; pyrexia n=4, abdominal pain n=1, erythema n=1, rash n=2); all were Grade 1 severity , except 1 event of Grade 2 pyrexia, and occurred within 7 days of dosing. No treatment-related serious AEs or new onset chronic diseases were observed. Six AESIs were reported in 5 children; all were Grade 1 hypersensitivity events limited to cutaneous findings (food allergy n=2, contrast media allergy n=1, urticaria n=2, erythema n=1), with 1 considered treatment-related (erythema). Three deaths occurred (LRTI, septic shock, and suspected tumor hemorrhage); all were determined to be unrelated to treatment. Eleven children developed treatment-emergent ADAs (median titer 200.0; Day 31 n=1, Day 151 n=1, and Day 361 n=9); none experienced a treatment-related serious AE, AESI, or skin hypersensitivity reaction. Of the children who were ADA-positive on Day 361, 1 experienced a treatment-related AE (Grade 1 pyrexia within 60 minutes of dosing), and 1 experienced a Grade 1 rash on Day 104, determined to be unrelated to treatment. Children who were ADA-positive on Day 361 were more likely to have nirsevimab levels below the limit of detection versus ADA-negative children, suggesting an influence of ADA on PK between Days 151 and 361. Nirsevimab serum exposures at Day 151 were similar to levels demonstrated to be effective in preventing medically attended RSV LRTI in healthy children enrolled in the Phase 3 MELODY trial (Figure 1). Fourteen children demonstrated a rapid decline in serum concentrations through Day 151 compared with the rest of the children; a review of their medical histories revealed evidence for protein-losing conditions, including graft versus host disease, chronic liver disease, and nephrotic syndrome, in 9 of the 14 children. Although none met protocol-defined case criteria for medically attended RSV LRTI, 3 children had an RSV-positive LRTI (central or local test) requiring medical attendance (in an inpatient or outpatient setting; all after Day 151), of whom 1 was hospitalized. Conclusions In immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months, a single dose of nirsevimab was well tolerated and no safety concerns arose over 361 days. Levels of ADA were low, with minimal effects on PK and no apparent impact on safety outcomes. Nirsevimab serum exposure was consistent with previous studies in healthy children and supportive of efficacy in this population at risk of severe RSV disease. Some children with underlying protein-losing conditions had a rapid decline in nirsevimab serum concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".