MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389232674 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-181263

Efficacy and Safety of the Anti-Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Marstacimab in Participants with Severe Hemophilia without Inhibitors: Results from the Phase 3 Basis Trial

2023· article· en· W4389232674 sur OpenAlexaff
Davide Matino, Suchitra S. Acharya, Andrew Palladino, Eunhee Hwang, Regina McDonald, Carrie Turich Taylor, John G. Teeter

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineFactor IXClinical endpointAdverse effectInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)Quality of life (healthcare)HemostasisObservational studyClinical trialPhases of clinical researchSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background:Marstacimab (PF-06741086) is a monoclonal antibody targeted to the tissue factor pathway inhibitor protein to improve hemostasis via the extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation. Previous phase 1/2 studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of long-term administration of marstacimab up to 450 mg weekly for reducing bleeding episodes in adults with severe hemophilia A (HA) or hemophilia B (HB), with or without inhibitors, compared with on-demand (OD) therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of marstacimab in participants with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB without inhibitors compared with previous factor replacement therapy. Methods: BASIS (NCT03938792) is an open-label, multicenter, pivotal phase 3 study that enrolled male participants aged ≥12 to ˂75 y with severe HA (factor [F] VIII ˂1%) or moderately severe to severe (FIX ≤2%) HB, with or without inhibitors. Following screening, participants entered a 6-month observational phase (OP) and were categorized by factor replacement treatment: (1) OD or (2) routine prophylaxis (RP). Participants who completed the OP crossed over to 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) and received a single subcutaneous loading dose of 300 mg followed by once weekly 150 mg marstacimab. Primary endpoints were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds and safety outcomes. Secondary endpoints included incidence of various types of breakthrough bleeds and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures. Participants who completed the ATP were eligible to enroll in the long-term extension (LTE) study. Informed consent/ethics committee approvals were obtained. Results for participants without inhibitors are presented. Results: Participants (N=128; 108 adults, 20 adolescents) with HA or HB without inhibitors entered the OP (OD: HA n=29, HB n=8; RP: n=72, HB n=19); of these, 116 entered the ATP. The median age was 30 [range, 13-66] y, most participants were White (50.8%) or Asian (47.7%) and predominately from Europe and India (51.6%). At baseline, 89 participants (69.5%; OD: n=36; RP: n=53) had ≥1 target joint. Mean (range) duration of marstacimab treatment was 12.1 (11.5-13.1) months for OD and 11.6 (0.9-12.8) months for RP. Eighty-eight participants entered the LTE (OD: HA n=22, HB n=7; RP: HA n=45; HB n=13). Data were not available by the cutoff date for 1 RP participant and was not included in the LTE safety analysis set. The mean (range) treatment duration in the LTE was 8.0 (1.2-14.5) months for OD and 6.5 (1.1-16.1) months for RP. In the phase 3 study, the OD group reported 12 (36.4%) adverse events (AEs) during ATP vs 9 (24.3%) in OP whereas the RP group reported 62 (74.7%) AEs in ATP vs 20 (22.0%) in OP. Both groups reported more treatment-related AEs during ATP ( Table 1). ADAs developed in 23/112 participants (20.5% incidence), of which titers were low and resolved in 22 participants by end of study. One RP participant discontinued due to a non-treatment-related SAE, and no deaths or thromboembolic events were recorded in the phase 3 study or the LTE. Mean (95% CI) ABR for treated bleeds was reduced for OD (91.6% [88.1-94.1%]) and RP (35.2% [5.6-55.6%]) participants over the 12-month ATP and marstacimab demonstrated superiority vs OD (P<0.001) and non-inferiority and superiority vs RP (P=0.0376) therapy. Marstacimab was also associated with significant reductions in ABR across all breakthrough bleed categories vs OD, and numerical reductions vs RP (non-inferiority). Overall, mean ABR declined over the first 6 months of ATP, which continued to Month 12 (data not shown). Bleed rates for an additional 16 months of follow-up in the LTE were consistent with those observed during the first 12 months of treatment in the phase 3 study ( Table 2). The ABR reductions observed with marstacimab during ATP were consistent across hemophilia types and age groups for OD and were generally consistent across hemophilia types and age groups for RP, with all point estimates for a difference <2.5 (non-inferiority margin for the ABR of treated bleeds). HRQoL parameters demonstrated non-significant improvements vs OD therapy and non-inferiority vs RP therapy. Conclusion: Compared with previous OD or RP therapy, once weekly subcutaneous marstacimab was safe and effective for reducing bleeding events in participants with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB without inhibitors beyond 12 months in the phase 3 study and up to an additional 16 months in the LTE study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemophilia Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207