MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389233331 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-185055

Real-World Outcomes of Pfts in Screening for Lung Involvement in Chronic Gvhd Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: A Retrospective Study of 387 Patients in British Columbia, Canada

2023· article· en· W4389233331 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Bo Wan, Yasser Abou Mourad, Shanee Chung, Donna L. Forrest, Florian Kuchenbauer, Stephen H. Nantel, Sujaatha Narayanan, Thomas J. Nevill, Maryse Power, Judith Anula Rodrigo, David Sanford, Kevin Song, Ryan J. Stubbins, Heather J. Sutherland, Cynthia L. Toze, Jennifer White, Claudie Roy, Kevin A. Hay

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer AgencyOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAsymptomaticInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyGraft-versus-host diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPopulationLungTransplantationSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Lung involvement in chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication with significant morbidity and mortality in patients who have received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). Unfortunately, early detection remains difficult as early lung cGVHD tends to be asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms such as cough or mild shortness of breath. In British Columbia (BC), Canada, routine pulmonary function tests (PFTs) have been employed in the screening of lung cGVHD in this population at an interval of every 3-4 months for the first 2-3 years after alloHSCT. However, it is unknown whether routine screening 1) improves detection of lung cGVHD, and 2) enables earlier intervention to lead to better outcomes. We aimed to assess the real-world outcomes of lung cGVHD screening and compared the characteristics and clinical results of patients who had lung cGVHD detected via routine PFT screening, versus those who were detected after development of symptoms. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all adult patients who underwent an alloHSCT at BC, Canada between June 2017 and January 2021. Patients were followed until August 2022. Patients were excluded if they had primary graft failure or if they died within 100 days after transplant. All types of pulmonary GVHD were included analysis and cases were established by the treating clinician in the clinical record. NIH consensus criteria were used to grade cGVHD severity. Statistical significance was calculated using the Chi square test for categorical variables and T-test for continuous variables. Results: Among 387 eligible consecutive patients who underwent alloHSCT, 189 (49%) developed cGVHD, with 33 (9%) cases of lung involvement. The mean time to diagnosis of lung cGVHD from the date of transplant was 13 ± 8 months. There were 16 cases of lung cGVHD (48%) that were initially detected by routine screening, while 17 cases (52%) were first detected due to clinical symptoms that developed in between screening visits or after the screening period ended (two patients developed symptoms at 27 months and 43 months respectively). Patient characteristics are presented on Table 1. Lung involvement was the first cGHVD sign in 17/33 (51%) of patients, with 5 (15%) detected by routine screening and 12 (36%) due to symptoms. At time of diagnosis of lung involvement, 12/33 (36%) of patients were already on systemic immunosuppression for cGVHD with 9 (56%) of these cases detected from screening and 3 (18%) from symptoms (p=0.02). All patients had a maximum overall cGVHD severity by NIH criteria of 2-3. Sixteen of 33 (48%) patients had a lung cGVHD score by NIH criteria of 2-3 at diagnosis, with a mean FEV1 of 54% ± 15, compared to 17 (52%) patients with a score of 1 and mean FEV1 of 78% ± 12. The NIH score at diagnosis was not significantly different between those picked up by routine screening versus symptoms (p=0.76). Eighteen of 33 (55%) patients had a maximum lung cGVHD score by NIH criteria of 2-3, with the mean lowest FEV1 of 52% ± 15, compared to 15 patients (45%) with a maximum lung cGVHD score of 1, with the mean lowest FEV1 of 77% ± 10. Similarly, the maximum NIH lung cGVHD score were not significantly different between those picked up by routine screening versus symptoms (p=0.08). However, patients picked up on screening were more likely to have significant clinical improvements in lung function (4/16 [25%] versus 0/17 [0%], p=0.03), and less likely to die from lung cGVHD (0/16 [0%] versus 5/17 [29%], p=0.02). Conclusions: Routine screening PFTs are effective for early diagnosis of asymptomatic lung cGVHD, and are associated with improved outcomes compared to patients who were diagnosed after symptoms developed. Since a significant number of these patients were not previously receiving immunosuppression for other cGVHD, this suggests a potential benefit in screening all patients every 3 months, regardless of prior GVHD status.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,077
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,155

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→Travaux en français237 207→