MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389233331 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-185055

Real-World Outcomes of Pfts in Screening for Lung Involvement in Chronic Gvhd Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: A Retrospective Study of 387 Patients in British Columbia, Canada

2023· article· en· W4389233331 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bo Wan, Yasser Abou Mourad, Shanee Chung, Donna L. Forrest, Florian Kuchenbauer, Stephen H. Nantel, Sujaatha Narayanan, Thomas J. Nevill, Maryse Power, Judith Anula Rodrigo, David Sanford, Kevin Song, Ryan J. Stubbins, Heather J. Sutherland, Cynthia L. Toze, Jennifer White, Claudie Roy, Kevin A. Hay

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyGraft-versus-host diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPopulationLungTransplantationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Lung involvement in chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication with significant morbidity and mortality in patients who have received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). Unfortunately, early detection remains difficult as early lung cGVHD tends to be asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms such as cough or mild shortness of breath. In British Columbia (BC), Canada, routine pulmonary function tests (PFTs) have been employed in the screening of lung cGVHD in this population at an interval of every 3-4 months for the first 2-3 years after alloHSCT. However, it is unknown whether routine screening 1) improves detection of lung cGVHD, and 2) enables earlier intervention to lead to better outcomes. We aimed to assess the real-world outcomes of lung cGVHD screening and compared the characteristics and clinical results of patients who had lung cGVHD detected via routine PFT screening, versus those who were detected after development of symptoms. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all adult patients who underwent an alloHSCT at BC, Canada between June 2017 and January 2021. Patients were followed until August 2022. Patients were excluded if they had primary graft failure or if they died within 100 days after transplant. All types of pulmonary GVHD were included analysis and cases were established by the treating clinician in the clinical record. NIH consensus criteria were used to grade cGVHD severity. Statistical significance was calculated using the Chi square test for categorical variables and T-test for continuous variables. Results: Among 387 eligible consecutive patients who underwent alloHSCT, 189 (49%) developed cGVHD, with 33 (9%) cases of lung involvement. The mean time to diagnosis of lung cGVHD from the date of transplant was 13 ± 8 months. There were 16 cases of lung cGVHD (48%) that were initially detected by routine screening, while 17 cases (52%) were first detected due to clinical symptoms that developed in between screening visits or after the screening period ended (two patients developed symptoms at 27 months and 43 months respectively). Patient characteristics are presented on Table 1. Lung involvement was the first cGHVD sign in 17/33 (51%) of patients, with 5 (15%) detected by routine screening and 12 (36%) due to symptoms. At time of diagnosis of lung involvement, 12/33 (36%) of patients were already on systemic immunosuppression for cGVHD with 9 (56%) of these cases detected from screening and 3 (18%) from symptoms (p=0.02). All patients had a maximum overall cGVHD severity by NIH criteria of 2-3. Sixteen of 33 (48%) patients had a lung cGVHD score by NIH criteria of 2-3 at diagnosis, with a mean FEV1 of 54% ± 15, compared to 17 (52%) patients with a score of 1 and mean FEV1 of 78% ± 12. The NIH score at diagnosis was not significantly different between those picked up by routine screening versus symptoms (p=0.76). Eighteen of 33 (55%) patients had a maximum lung cGVHD score by NIH criteria of 2-3, with the mean lowest FEV1 of 52% ± 15, compared to 15 patients (45%) with a maximum lung cGVHD score of 1, with the mean lowest FEV1 of 77% ± 10. Similarly, the maximum NIH lung cGVHD score were not significantly different between those picked up by routine screening versus symptoms (p=0.08). However, patients picked up on screening were more likely to have significant clinical improvements in lung function (4/16 [25%] versus 0/17 [0%], p=0.03), and less likely to die from lung cGVHD (0/16 [0%] versus 5/17 [29%], p=0.02). Conclusions: Routine screening PFTs are effective for early diagnosis of asymptomatic lung cGVHD, and are associated with improved outcomes compared to patients who were diagnosed after symptoms developed. Since a significant number of these patients were not previously receiving immunosuppression for other cGVHD, this suggests a potential benefit in screening all patients every 3 months, regardless of prior GVHD status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→French-language works237,207→