Gender-Related Factors Associated With Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Female Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) remains a significant global health concern, with a growing recognition of its impact on young adults, particularly young females. While gender-related factors, defined as a social construct that encompasses four distinct dimensions (gender roles, gender identity, gender relations, and institutionalized gender) are undoubtedly relevant across age groups, young females with ACS face specific challenges and disparities in outcomes compared to other populations. This narrative review examines the role of gender-related factors - specifically gender roles, gender identity, gender relations, and institutionalized gender - in influencing objective and subjective ACS outcomes in young females. In the five manuscripts identified, the objective outcomes included hospital readmission, door-to-ECG time, and coronary atherosclerosis progression. Subjective outcomes such as physical and mental functional status, quality of life, physical limitations, and vital exhaustion were also examined. Employment status, a gender role, emerged as a protective factor against hospital readmission. Gender identity factors like depression and stress correlated with negative outcomes, while anxiety influenced door-to-ECG times. Institutional factors, including income disparities, affected readmission likelihood. Strong social support improved physical limitations post-ACS, whereas financial challenges and lower education negatively impacted quality of life and vital exhaustion. These findings underscore the intricate interplay of gender dimensions in shaping ACS outcomes among young females. Integrating these insights into clinical practice and research can enhance care, mitigate disparities, and foster improved cardiovascular health in this vulnerable population. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) remains a significant global health concern, with a growing recognition of its impact on young adults, particularly young females. While gender-related factors, defined as a social construct that encompasses four distinct dimensions (gender roles, gender identity, gender relations, and institutionalized gender) are undoubtedly relevant across age groups, young females with ACS face specific challenges and disparities in outcomes compared to other populations. This narrative review examines the role of gender-related factors - specifically gender roles, gender identity, gender relations, and institutionalized gender - in influencing objective and subjective ACS outcomes in young females. In the five manuscripts identified, the objective outcomes included hospital readmission, door-to-ECG time, and coronary atherosclerosis progression. Subjective outcomes such as physical and mental functional status, quality of life, physical limitations, and vital exhaustion were also examined. Employment status, a gender role, emerged as a protective factor against hospital readmission. Gender identity factors like depression and stress correlated with negative outcomes, while anxiety influenced door-to-ECG times. Institutional factors, including income disparities, affected readmission likelihood. Strong social support improved physical limitations post-ACS, whereas financial challenges and lower education negatively impacted quality of life and vital exhaustion. These findings underscore the intricate interplay of gender dimensions in shaping ACS outcomes among young females. Integrating these insights into clinical practice and research can enhance care, mitigate disparities, and foster improved cardiovascular health in this vulnerable population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».