Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Elranatamab Monotherapy in the Phase 2 Magnetismm-3 Trial in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND Elranatamab is a humanized, bispecific antibody that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells, with the aim of inducing T-cell-mediated cytolysis of the myeloma cells. In the MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) trial, an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized, phase 2 registrational study of elranatamab monotherapy, patients with RRMM who had not received prior BCMA-directed therapy (ie, BCMA-naïve patients; n=123) achieved objective responses with an overall response rate (ORR) of 61%. Here, we report the long-term efficacy and safety of elranatamab. METHODS Eligible patients had previously received at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. Patients received step-up doses of 12 and 32 mg elranatamab subcutaneously on days 1 and 4 of cycle 1, respectively, followed by 76 mg elranatamab once-weekly (QW), starting on day 8 of the first 4-week cycle. Patients who received ≥6 months of QW dosing and achieved ≥ partial response lasting at least 2 months were transitioned to a once every 2 weeks (Q2W) dosing schedule and from Q2W to once every 4 weeks after at least 6 Q2W cycles. Treatment with elranatamab continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was ORR, assessed by blinded-central review per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) status was assessed using next-generation sequencing, with MRD negativity defined as <1 myeloma cell in 10 5 nucleated cells. Adverse events were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) severity were graded by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 15.9 months (data cutoff, April 16, 2023), 32.5% of patients remained on treatment. The confirmed ORR was 61.0% (n=123; 95% CI, 51.8-69.6), with 35.8% of patients achieving complete responses (CR) or better. Among evaluable patients (those with ≥CR and evaluable for MRD, n=29), 89.7% achieved MRD negativity. Median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) have not been reached, and the probabilities of maintaining a response, being progression-free, and being alive at 15 months were 70.8% (95% CI, 58.2-80.2), 50.2% (95% CI, 40.2-59.3), and 56.3% (95% CI, 47.0-64.6), respectively. All participants (100%) had ≥1 any grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and 70.7% of patients had grade 3/4 TEAEs. The most common any grade (≥25%) and grade 3/4 (≥10%) adverse events (any grade, grade 3/4) were infections (69.9%, 40.7%), CRS (57.7%, 0%), anemia (48.8%, 37.4%), neutropenia (48.8%, 48.8%), diarrhea (41.5%, 1.6%) thrombocytopenia (31.7%, 23.6%), lymphopenia (26.8%, 25.2%), fatigue (36.6%, 4.1%), nausea (26.8%, 0%), injection site reaction (26.8%, 0%), hypokalemia (26.0%, 10.6%), cough (26.0%, 0%) pyrexia (30.9%, 4.1%), decreased appetite (33.3%, 0.8%), leukopenia (15.4%, 13.0%) and COVID-19 pneumonia (14.6%, 11.4%). CONCLUSIONS Extended follow-up from the ongoing phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial of elranatamab in heavily pretreated participants with RRMM demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy, with median DOR, PFS, and OS not reached, and no new safety signals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».