MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389243603 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179304

Efficacy and Safety of Valemetostat Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas: Primary Results of the Phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 Study

2023· article· en· W4389243603 sur OpenAlexaff
Steven M. Horwitz, Koji Izutsu, Neha Mehta–Shah, Raúl Córdoba, Stefan K. Barta, Emmanuel Bachy, Giuseppe Gritti, Eric D. Jacobsen, Shigeru Kusumoto, Yann Guillermin, Anca Prica, Dok Hyun Yoon, Eva Domingo‐Doménech, Jie Wang, Jin Seok Kim, Kate Cwynarski, Marjolein van der Poel, Ai Inoue, Jin Jin, Sutan Wu, Keiko Nakajima, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointBrentuximab vedotinPeripheral T-cell lymphomaAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaLymphomaOncologyNeutropeniaPhases of clinical researchProgression-free survivalSurrogate endpointRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyClinical trialChemotherapyImmunologyHodgkin lymphomaT cellImmune system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), with limited available treatment options for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Valemetostat tosylate (valemetostat) is a novel and potent dual inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH)2 and EZH1, which is approved in Japan for the treatment of R/R adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). Here, we report primary results for pts with R/R PTCL treated with valemetostat in the open-label, single-arm, global, phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 study (DS3201-A-U202; NCT04703192). Methods: Pts were ≥ 18 years of age, had a confirmed diagnosis of PTCL, had R/R disease after ≥ 1 prior line of systemic therapy, and pts with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) had received prior brentuximab vedotin treatment. Pts received oral valemetostat 200 mg/day in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by blinded independent central review of PTCL following computed tomography (CT)-based response assessment according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT-based response assessment by Lugano 2014 criteria was an exploratory endpoint. Efficacy analyses included all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat and had an eligible PTCL subtype confirmed by central hematopathology review; safety analyses included all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat. Results: A total of 133 pts with R/R PTCL were enrolled and received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat. Pts had a median age of 69 years (range 22-85) and 91 pts (68.4%) were male. Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-12) and 35 pts (26.3%) received prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT; autologous, n = 32; allogeneic, n = 5). PTCL subtype eligibility was confirmed in 119 pts: 42 pts (31.6%) had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 41 (30.8%) had PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), 9 (6.8%) had ALCL (7 [5.3%] ALK-negative and 2 [1.5%] ALK-positive), 8 (6.0%) had nodal PTCL with T follicular helper cell phenotype, and 19 (14.3%) had other PTCL subtypes. As of data cutoff (May 5, 2023), 32 pts (24.1%) were still receiving treatment; reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive or relapsed disease in 46 pts (34.6%), clinical progression in 19 pts (14.3%), adverse event in 13 pts (9.8%), and 12 pts (9.0%) discontinued study drug to proceed with allogeneic HCT. Median treatment duration was 18 weeks (range 0.3-93.4) and median duration of follow-up was 10.5 months (range 0.2-21.5). Among 119 efficacy-evaluable pts, the CT-based ORR was 43.7% (n = 52) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.6-53.1), including 17 pts (14.3%) achieving CR and 35 pts (29.4%) achieving PR as best overall response. Median DOR was 11.9 months (95% CI, 7.8-not evaluable [NE]) and median time to response was 8.1 weeks (range 5-37). ORR by PTCL subtype ranged from 31.7% for PTCL, NOS to 54.8% for AITL (Table 1). Using PET-CT-based response assessment, ORR was 52.1% (n = 62) (95% CI, 42.8-61.3), including 32 pts (26.9%) with a complete metabolic response. Median CT-based PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-8.3) and median OS was 17.0 months (95% CI, 13.5-NE). Of 133 pts in the safety analysis set, 128 pts (96.2%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade, 77 pts (57.9%) experienced grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, and 53 pts (39.8%) experienced serious adverse events. The most common all grade and grade ≥ 3 TEAE was thrombocytopenia (Table 2). Overall, 13 pts (9.8%) experienced a TEAE that led to treatment discontinuation, 21 pts (15.8%) had a TEAE that led to dose reduction, and 66 pts (49.6%) had a TEAE that led to dose interruption. Conclusions: Valemetostat demonstrated a high ORR of 43.7% with durable responses (median DOR of 11.9 months) in pts with R/R PTCL, and responses were observed across all PTCL subtypes. A valemetostat dose of 200 mg/day was tolerable; safety analysis showed that the most common TEAEs were cytopenias. These primary results from the VALENTINE-PTCL01 study suggest that valemetostat provides a clinically meaningful benefit for pts with R/R PTCL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,151
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesTravaux en français237 207