Platelet Count Response to Obstetrical Use of IVIG for Maternal Thrombocytopenia: A 14-Year Retrospective Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Thrombocytopenia affects approximately 10% of pregnant individuals with Gestational Thrombocytopenia (GT) accounting for 80% of cases and Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) representing 3% of cases. Distinguishing between GT and ITP is challenging, leading to many pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia receiving treatment for ‘possible ITP’ with Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) in attempt to raise platelet counts (PLT) for safe labor and delivery and to potentially allow for neuraxial anesthesia. However, evidence on the impact of IVIG on PLT during pregnancy remains limited, and predictive factors for IVIG response are lacking. We aim to investigate the effect of IVIG on PLT in pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia (PLT < 100 x 10 9/L). The specific objectives are to assess the incremental response in maternal PLT following IVIG administration, the proportion of PLT exceeding 80 x 10 9/L after IVIG administration, the proportion of incremental increase in PLT by more than 20 x 10 9/L following IVIG administration, and to identify factors associated with these outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative and chart review data between 2007-2020. We included all pregnant individuals who received IVIG for moderate thrombocytopenia. Data collected encompassed parameters such as age, gestational age at delivery, platelet counts at various timepoints, highest immature platelet fraction (IPF) during pregnancy, IVIG dose and frequency, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and corticosteroid use. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Paired t-test was used to compare means of PLT pre- and post-IVIG administration. Simple logistic regression was used to assess predictors of PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L post-IVIG. Results: Out of 651 deliveries with moderate thrombocytopenia, 79 (12.1%) received IVIG for a total of 4,527.50 grams and a median dose of 60 g (IQR: 30 - 77.5). Excluding 22 pregnancies due to other interventions such as platelet transfusions (n=12), corticosteroids (n=7), or both (n=3), 57 remained for analysis. The median incremental response in PLT following IVIG administration was 27 x10 9/L (IQR: 3-94). Pre-IVIG PLT median was 65 x10 9/L (IQR: 48-73), and post-IVIG PLT median was 98 x10 9/L (IQR: 69-142). PLT increment ≥ 20 x 10 9/L following IVIG was observed in 54.4% (31/57) of deliveries, and 57.9% (33/57) of deliveries achieved PLT ≥ 80 x 10 9/L following IVIG administration. Mean PLT post-IVIG (M = 112.51 x10 9/L, SD 55.88) were significantly greater than pre-IVIG PLT (M = 59 x10 9/L, SD = 19.71) by 53.51 points, p = < .001. Nadir PLT < 30 in pregnancy was associated with a statistically significant increase in PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L following IVIG (odds ratio (OR) = 6.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.25-31.51, p < 0.05) and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L (OR = 7.58, 95% CI = 1.51-38.05, p < 0.05). An IPF < 16% was also associated with a statistically significant increase in PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 1.08-21.76, p < 0.05) and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 1.08 - 21.76, p < 0.05). Moreover, a post-IVIG PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L was positively associated with pre-IVIG PLT below 50 x10 9/L (OR = 8.67, 95% CI = 1.73 - 43.33, p < 0.05), but negatively associated with PLT 70-100 x10 9/L (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.05 - 0.57, p < 0.05). For post-IVIG PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L, there were no statistically significant relationships with gestational age, maternal age, pre-pregnant PLT or pre-IVIG PLT. Similarly, for post-IVIG PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L, there were no statistically significant relationships with GA, maternal age, pre-pregnant PLT, or a pre-IVIG PLT between 50-69 x10 9/L. Conclusions: IVIG administration shows promising results for pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia. The study highlights the importance of nadir PLT in pregnancy, IPF levels, and pre-IVIG PLT as potential factors influencing the response to IVIG treatment. Our study is limited by its retrospective and single-centered design, and small sample size. Nevertheless, these findings generate hypotheses and could inform future prospective multicenter studies to optimize IVIG administration in this setting, considering its effectiveness and potential risks while minimizing costs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».