MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389248284 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-189377

Platelet Count Response to Obstetrical Use of IVIG for Maternal Thrombocytopenia: A 14-Year Retrospective Study

2023· article· en· W4389248284 on OpenAlexaff
Roy Khalifé, Bonnie Niu, Iris Perelman, Darine El‐Chaâr, Dean Fergusson, Alan Karovitch, Johnathan Mack, Melanie Tokessy, Kathryn E. Webert, Alan Tinmouth

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityCanadian Blood ServicesCanadian Electricity AssociationOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionGestational ageCohortPlateletImmune thrombocytopeniaPediatricsObstetricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Thrombocytopenia affects approximately 10% of pregnant individuals with Gestational Thrombocytopenia (GT) accounting for 80% of cases and Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) representing 3% of cases. Distinguishing between GT and ITP is challenging, leading to many pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia receiving treatment for ‘possible ITP’ with Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) in attempt to raise platelet counts (PLT) for safe labor and delivery and to potentially allow for neuraxial anesthesia. However, evidence on the impact of IVIG on PLT during pregnancy remains limited, and predictive factors for IVIG response are lacking. We aim to investigate the effect of IVIG on PLT in pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia (PLT < 100 x 10 9/L). The specific objectives are to assess the incremental response in maternal PLT following IVIG administration, the proportion of PLT exceeding 80 x 10 9/L after IVIG administration, the proportion of incremental increase in PLT by more than 20 x 10 9/L following IVIG administration, and to identify factors associated with these outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative and chart review data between 2007-2020. We included all pregnant individuals who received IVIG for moderate thrombocytopenia. Data collected encompassed parameters such as age, gestational age at delivery, platelet counts at various timepoints, highest immature platelet fraction (IPF) during pregnancy, IVIG dose and frequency, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and corticosteroid use. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Paired t-test was used to compare means of PLT pre- and post-IVIG administration. Simple logistic regression was used to assess predictors of PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L post-IVIG. Results: Out of 651 deliveries with moderate thrombocytopenia, 79 (12.1%) received IVIG for a total of 4,527.50 grams and a median dose of 60 g (IQR: 30 - 77.5). Excluding 22 pregnancies due to other interventions such as platelet transfusions (n=12), corticosteroids (n=7), or both (n=3), 57 remained for analysis. The median incremental response in PLT following IVIG administration was 27 x10 9/L (IQR: 3-94). Pre-IVIG PLT median was 65 x10 9/L (IQR: 48-73), and post-IVIG PLT median was 98 x10 9/L (IQR: 69-142). PLT increment ≥ 20 x 10 9/L following IVIG was observed in 54.4% (31/57) of deliveries, and 57.9% (33/57) of deliveries achieved PLT ≥ 80 x 10 9/L following IVIG administration. Mean PLT post-IVIG (M = 112.51 x10 9/L, SD 55.88) were significantly greater than pre-IVIG PLT (M = 59 x10 9/L, SD = 19.71) by 53.51 points, p = < .001. Nadir PLT < 30 in pregnancy was associated with a statistically significant increase in PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L following IVIG (odds ratio (OR) = 6.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.25-31.51, p < 0.05) and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L (OR = 7.58, 95% CI = 1.51-38.05, p < 0.05). An IPF < 16% was also associated with a statistically significant increase in PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 1.08-21.76, p < 0.05) and PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 1.08 - 21.76, p < 0.05). Moreover, a post-IVIG PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L was positively associated with pre-IVIG PLT below 50 x10 9/L (OR = 8.67, 95% CI = 1.73 - 43.33, p < 0.05), but negatively associated with PLT 70-100 x10 9/L (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.05 - 0.57, p < 0.05). For post-IVIG PLT ≥ 80 x10 9/L, there were no statistically significant relationships with gestational age, maternal age, pre-pregnant PLT or pre-IVIG PLT. Similarly, for post-IVIG PLT increment ≥ 20 x10 9/L, there were no statistically significant relationships with GA, maternal age, pre-pregnant PLT, or a pre-IVIG PLT between 50-69 x10 9/L. Conclusions: IVIG administration shows promising results for pregnant individuals with moderate thrombocytopenia. The study highlights the importance of nadir PLT in pregnancy, IPF levels, and pre-IVIG PLT as potential factors influencing the response to IVIG treatment. Our study is limited by its retrospective and single-centered design, and small sample size. Nevertheless, these findings generate hypotheses and could inform future prospective multicenter studies to optimize IVIG administration in this setting, considering its effectiveness and potential risks while minimizing costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→