Interest of Cytoreductive Therapy before Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Childhood Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Retrospective Study on Behalf of the Société Francophone De Greffe De Moelle Et De Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Pediatric myelodysplastic syndromes (cMDS) are rare and biologically different from that seen in adults. In addition to a specific genomic landscape, they are characterized by the high frequency of hypoplastic forms, and the recurrent association with germline predispositions (Khoury et al. 2022; Locatelli et Strahm 2018). For most patients, allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative option. In case of cMDS with increased blasts (cMDS-IB), pre-tranplant cytoreductive chemotherapy may be considered, but remains controversial (Strahm et al. 2011). Methods This multicenter retrospective study included all cMDS patients (<18y.o.) reported to the SFGM-TC registry who underwent an allo-HSCT between 2000 and 2020. Data have been obtained through ProMISe (internet-based system shared by all EBMT transplantation centers). All patients have given signed informed consent. Results Eighty-four cMDS patients from 17 centers were included. Median age at transplant was 10.2 years (IQR: 7.2, 14.2). Fifty-two percent of patients presented with increased blasts at diagnosis. Germline predispositions were known in 24% of patients. GATA 2 mutations were the most frequent (14%). Eighty-two percent of patients presented with hematologic cytogenetic abnormalities, including 64% of monosomy 7. Myeloablative conditioning was used in most of cases (91%). Busulfan/melphalan was the most frequent conditioning regimen (58%). HSCT were performed from sibling donors in 29% of the cases, matched unrelated donors (MUD) in 44%, umbilical cord blood (UCB) in 21% and haploidentical in 6%. Stem cell source was bone marrow in 68% of the cases. Considering the whole cohort, 5y overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 67% (IC95% 57-78%) and 63% (IC95% 54-74%) respectively (Figure 1). Five years cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 26% (IC95% 17-35%) and 12% (IC95% 5.6-20%) respectively. Of the 21 cases of reported toxic death, 15 were related to acute GVH (aGVHD). Six months cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft vs host disease were 46 % and 24 % respectively. In univariate analysis, patients under 12 years (p=0,018) or who received a BuCyMel conditioning (p=0,004) or a graft from a MUD (p=0,030) had worst 5y OS and PFS. As expected, OS increased with time (p=0,014) reflecting improvements in supportive care and HSCT procedures (Figure 2A). These results were confirmed in multivariate analysis, except for MUD. Twenty-four patients received pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy, most often intensive chemotherapy (20/24). In the overall population, pre-transplant cytoreduction was not associated with an improved survival. However, subgroup analysis of the 40 patients with cMDS-IB showed a significant improvement of the OS probability (HR 0.18 [0.04-0.83], p=0.014) in patients who received a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in univariate analysis (Figure 2B). Cytoreductive therapy did not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of relapse, but with a lower risk of NRM. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of aGVHD was higher in patients who did not receive any cytoreductive therapy (HR 0.60 [0.09-3.85]). Conclusion: This retrospective study reports the outcomes of 84 patients who underwent allo-HCT for childhoodMDS. This study seems to show a benefit associated with the pre-transplant cytoreduction therapy in the subgroup of patients with cMDS-IB, notably through a reduction of aGVHD and NRM occurrence. BuCyMel conditioning, currently recommended for cMDS-IB, appears here, to be associated with excess of toxic mortality. This study also confirms the high aGVH-related toxic mortality rates already reported in cMDS (Strahm et al. 2011). Recent retrospective data have shown a benefit of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in GATA2 patients transplanted with sibling or matched unrelated donors (Nichols-Vinueza et al. 2022). Prospective data on the use of PTCy in cMDS are therefore needed. Acknowledgment: This research is funded by the non-profit organization Etoile de Martin/SFCE.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».